Proof.
Let \mathcal{B} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}) be the set of weakly contractible objects of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}. Every object T of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} has a covering \{ T_ i \to T\} _{i \in I} with I finite and T_ i \in \mathcal{B} by Lemma 61.13.5. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.12.6 we get a hypercovering K of U such that K_ n = \{ U_{n, i}\} _{i \in I_ n} with I_ n finite and U_{n, i} weakly contractible. Then we can replace K by the hypercovering of U given by \{ U_ n\} in degree n where U_ n = \coprod _{i \in I_ n} U_{n, i} This is allowed by Hypercoverings, Remark 25.12.9.
Let X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} \subset X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} be the full subcategory consisting of quasi-compact and quasi-separated objects. A covering of X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} will be a finite pro-étale covering. Then X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} is a site, has fibre products, and the inclusion functor X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} \to X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} is continuous and commutes with fibre products. In particular, if K is a hypercovering of an object U in X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} then K is a hypercovering of U in X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} by Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.12.5. Let \mathcal{B} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}}) be the set of affine and weakly contractible objects. By Lemma 61.13.3 and the fact that finite unions of affines are affine, for every object U of X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} there exists a covering \{ V \to U\} of X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} with V \in \mathcal{B}. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.12.6 we get a hypercovering K of U such that K_ n = \{ U_{n, i}\} _{i \in I_ n} with I_ n finite and U_{n, i} affine and weakly contractible. Then we can replace K by the hypercovering of U given by \{ U_ n\} in degree n where U_ n = \coprod _{i \in I_ n} U_{n, i}. This is allowed by Hypercoverings, Remark 25.12.9.
\square
Comments (0)