Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 61.14.1. Let X be a scheme.

  1. For every object U of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} there exists a hypercovering K of U in X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} such that each term K_ n consists of a single weakly contractible object of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} covering U.

  2. For every quasi-compact and quasi-separated object U of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} there exists a hypercovering K of U in X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} such that each term K_ n consists of a single affine and weakly contractible object of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} covering U.

Proof. Let \mathcal{B} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}) be the set of weakly contractible objects of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}. Every object T of X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} has a covering \{ T_ i \to T\} _{i \in I} with I finite and T_ i \in \mathcal{B} by Lemma 61.13.5. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.12.6 we get a hypercovering K of U such that K_ n = \{ U_{n, i}\} _{i \in I_ n} with I_ n finite and U_{n, i} weakly contractible. Then we can replace K by the hypercovering of U given by \{ U_ n\} in degree n where U_ n = \coprod _{i \in I_ n} U_{n, i} This is allowed by Hypercoverings, Remark 25.12.9.

Let X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} \subset X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} be the full subcategory consisting of quasi-compact and quasi-separated objects. A covering of X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} will be a finite pro-étale covering. Then X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} is a site, has fibre products, and the inclusion functor X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} \to X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} is continuous and commutes with fibre products. In particular, if K is a hypercovering of an object U in X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} then K is a hypercovering of U in X_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} by Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.12.5. Let \mathcal{B} \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}}) be the set of affine and weakly contractible objects. By Lemma 61.13.3 and the fact that finite unions of affines are affine, for every object U of X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} there exists a covering \{ V \to U\} of X_{qcqs, {pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}} with V \in \mathcal{B}. By Hypercoverings, Lemma 25.12.6 we get a hypercovering K of U such that K_ n = \{ U_{n, i}\} _{i \in I_ n} with I_ n finite and U_{n, i} affine and weakly contractible. Then we can replace K by the hypercovering of U given by \{ U_ n\} in degree n where U_ n = \coprod _{i \in I_ n} U_{n, i}. This is allowed by Hypercoverings, Remark 25.12.9. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.