Lemma 73.9.6. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated algebraic space over $S$. Let $W \subset X$ be a quasi-compact open subspace. Let $P$ be a property of quasi-compact open subspaces of $X$. Assume that

1. $P$ holds for $W$, and

2. for every elementary distinguished square $(W_1 \subset W_2, f : V \to W_2)$ where such that

1. $W_1$, $W_2$ are quasi-compact open subspaces of $X$,

2. $W \subset W_1$,

3. $V$ is affine, and

4. $P$ holds for $W_1$,

then $P$ holds for $W_2$.

Then $P$ holds for $X$.

Proof. We can deduce this from Lemma 73.9.4, but instead we will give a direct argument by explicitly redoing the proof of Lemma 73.9.3. We will use the filtration

$\emptyset = U_{n + 1} \subset U_ n \subset U_{n - 1} \subset \ldots \subset U_1 = X$

and the morphisms $f_ p : V_ p \to U_ p$ of Decent Spaces, Lemma 66.8.6. We will prove that $P$ holds for $W_ p = W \cup U_ p$ by descending induction on $p$. This will finish the proof as $W_1 = X$. Note that $P$ holds for $W_{n + 1} = W \cap U_{n + 1} = W$ by (1). Assume $P$ holds for $W_{p + 1}$. Observe that $W_ p \setminus W_{p + 1}$ (with reduced induced subspace structure) is a closed subspace of $U_ p \setminus U_{p + 1}$. Since $(U_{p + 1} \subset U_ p, f_ p : V_ p \to U_ p)$ is an elementary distinguished square, the same is true for $(W_{p + 1} \subset W_ p, f_ p : V_ p \to W_ p)$. However (2) may not apply as $V_ p$ may not be affine. However, as $V_ p$ is a quasi-compact scheme we may choose a finite affine open covering $V_ p = V_{p, 1} \cup \ldots \cup V_{p, m}$. Set $W_{p, 0} = W_{p + 1}$ and

$W_{p, i} = W_{p + 1} \cup f_ p(V_{p, 1} \cup \ldots \cup V_{p, i})$

for $i = 1, \ldots , m$. These are quasi-compact open subspaces of $X$ containing $W$. Then we have

$W_{p + 1} = W_{p, 0} \subset W_{p, 1} \subset \ldots \subset W_{p, m} = W_ p$

and the pairs

$(W_{p, 0} \subset W_{p, 1}, f_ p|_{V_{p, 1}}), (W_{p, 1} \subset W_{p, 2}, f_ p|_{V_{p, 2}}),\ldots , (W_{p, m - 1} \subset W_{p, m}, f_ p|_{V_{p, m}})$

are elementary distinguished squares by Lemma 73.9.2. Now (2) applies to each of these and we inductively conclude $P$ holds for $W_{p, 1}, \ldots , W_{p, m} = W_ p$. $\square$

## Comments (0)

There are also:

• 4 comment(s) on Section 73.9: Induction principle

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 09IT. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.