22.5 The homotopy category
Our homotopies take into account the A-module structure and the grading, but not the differential (of course).
Definition 22.5.1. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. Let f, g : M \to N be homomorphisms of differential graded A-modules. A homotopy between f and g is an A-module map h : M \to N such that
h(M^ n) \subset N^{n - 1} for all n, and
f(x) - g(x) = \text{d}_ N(h(x)) + h(\text{d}_ M(x)) for all x \in M.
If a homotopy exists, then we say f and g are homotopic.
Thus h is compatible with the A-module structure and the grading but not with the differential. If f = g and h is a homotopy as in the definition, then h defines a morphism h : M \to N[-1] in \text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}.
Lemma 22.5.2. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. Let f, g : L \to M be homomorphisms of differential graded A-modules. Suppose given further homomorphisms a : K \to L, and c : M \to N. If h : L \to M is an A-module map which defines a homotopy between f and g, then c \circ h \circ a defines a homotopy between c \circ f \circ a and c \circ g \circ a.
Proof.
Immediate from Homology, Lemma 12.13.7.
\square
This lemma allows us to define the homotopy category as follows.
Definition 22.5.3. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. The homotopy category, denoted K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}), is the category whose objects are the objects of \text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})} and whose morphisms are homotopy classes of homomorphisms of differential graded A-modules.
The notation K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}) is not standard but at least is consistent with the use of K(-) in other places of the Stacks project.
Lemma 22.5.4. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. The homotopy category K(\text{Mod}_{(A, \text{d})}) has direct sums and products.
Proof.
Omitted. Hint: Just use the direct sums and products as in Lemma 22.4.2. This works because we saw that these functors commute with the forgetful functor to the category of graded A-modules and because \prod is an exact functor on the category of families of abelian groups.
\square
Comments (3)
Comment #288 by arp on
Comment #1057 by Kian Abolfazlian on
Comment #1062 by Johan on