Proof.
Let \mathcal{D} \subset K(A, \text{d}) be the triangulated subcategory discussed in Remark 22.36.1. Let P be an object of \mathcal{D} which is finite projective as a graded A-module. Then P represents a compact object of D(A, \text{d}) by Remark 22.36.2.
To prove the converse, let E be a compact object of D(A, \text{d}). Fix a \leq b as in Lemma 22.36.5. After decreasing a and increasing b if necessary, we may also assume that H^ i(E) = 0 for i \not\in [a, b] (this follows from Proposition 22.36.4 and our assumption on A). Moreover, fix an integer c > 0 such that A^ n = 0 if |n| \geq c.
By Proposition 22.36.4 we see that E is a direct summand, in D(A, \text{d}), of a differential graded A-module P which has a finite filtration F_\bullet by differential graded submodules such that F_ iP/F_{i - 1}P are finite direct sums of shifts of A. In particular, P has property (P) and we have \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(P, M) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(A, \text{d})}(P, M) for any differential graded module M by Lemma 22.22.3. In other words, P is an object of the triangulated subcategory \mathcal{D} \subset K(A, \text{d}) discussed in Remark 22.36.1. Note that P is finite free as a graded A-module.
Choose n > 0 such that b + 4c - n < a. Represent the projector onto E by an endomorphism \varphi : P \to P of differential graded A-modules. Consider the distinguished triangle
P \xrightarrow {1 - \varphi } P \to C \to P[1]
in K(A, \text{d}) where C is the cone of the first arrow. Then C is an object of \mathcal{D}, we have C \cong E \oplus E[1] in D(A, \text{d}), and C is a finite graded free A-module. Next, consider a distinguished triangle
C[1] \to C \to C' \to C[2]
in K(A, \text{d}) where C' is the cone on a morphism C[1] \to C representing the composition
C[1] \cong E[1] \oplus E[2] \to E[1] \to E \oplus E[1] \cong C
in D(A, \text{d}). Then we see that C' represents E \oplus E[2]. Continuing in this manner we see that we can find a differential graded A-module P which is an object of \mathcal{D}, is a finite free as a graded A-module, and represents E \oplus E[n].
Choose a basis x_ i, i \in I of homogeneous elements for P as an A-module. Let d_ i = \deg (x_ i). Let P_1 be the A-submodule of P generated by x_ i and \text{d}(x_ i) for d_ i \leq a - c - 1. Let P_2 be the A-submodule of P generated by x_ i and \text{d}(x_ i) for d_ i \geq b - n + c. We observe
P_1 and P_2 are differential graded submodules of P,
P_1^ t = 0 for t \geq a,
P_1^ t = P^ t for t \leq a - 2c,
P_2^ t = 0 for t \leq b - n,
P_2^ t = P^ t for t \geq b - n + 2c.
As b - n + 2c \geq a - 2c by our choice of n we obtain a short exact sequence of differential graded A-modules
0 \to P_1 \cap P_2 \to P_1 \oplus P_2 \xrightarrow {\pi } P \to 0
Since P is projective as a graded A-module this is an admissible short exact sequence (Lemma 22.16.1). Hence we obtain a boundary map \delta : P \to (P_1 \cap P_2)[1] in K(A, \text{d}), see Lemma 22.7.2. Since P = E \oplus E[n] and since P_1 \cap P_2 lives in degrees (b - n, a) we find that \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(E \oplus E[n], (P_1 \cap P_2)[1]) is zero. Therefore \delta = 0 as a morphism in K(A, \text{d}) as P is an object of \mathcal{D}. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.4.11 we can find a map s : P \to P_1 \oplus P_2 such that \pi \circ s = \text{id}_ P + \text{d}h + h\text{d} for some h : P \to P of degree -1. Since P_1 \oplus P_2 \to P is surjective and since P is projective as a graded A-module we can choose a homogeneous lift \tilde h : P \to P_1 \oplus P_2 of h. Then we change s into s + \text{d} \tilde h + \tilde h \text{d} to get \pi \circ s = \text{id}_ P. This means we obtain a direct sum decomposition P = s^{-1}(P_1) \oplus s^{-1}(P_2). Since s^{-1}(P_2) is equal to P in degrees \geq b - n + 2c we see that s^{-1}(P_2) \to P \to E is a quasi-isomorphism, i.e., an isomorphism in D(A, \text{d}). This finishes the proof.
\square
Comments (0)