22.36 Characterizing compact objects
Compact objects of additive categories are defined in Derived Categories, Definition 13.37.1. In this section we characterize compact objects of the derived category of a differential graded algebra.
Lemma 22.36.3. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. Let E be a compact object of D(A, \text{d}). Let P be a differential graded A-module which has a finite filtration
0 = F_{-1}P \subset F_0P \subset F_1P \subset \ldots \subset F_ nP = P
by differential graded submodules such that
F_{i + 1}P/F_ iP \cong \bigoplus \nolimits _{j \in J_ i} A[k_{i, j}]
as differential graded A-modules for some sets J_ i and integers k_{i, j}. Let E \to P be a morphism of D(A, \text{d}). Then there exists a differential graded submodule P' \subset P such that F_{i + 1}P \cap P'/(F_ iP \cap P') is equal to \bigoplus _{j \in J'_ i} A[k_{i, j}] for some finite subsets J'_ i \subset J_ i and such that E \to P factors through P'.
Proof.
We will prove by induction on -1 \leq m \leq n that there exists a differential graded submodule P' \subset P such that
F_ mP \subset P',
for i \geq m the quotient F_{i + 1}P \cap P'/(F_ iP \cap P') is isomorphic to \bigoplus _{j \in J'_ i} A[k_{i, j}] for some finite subsets J'_ i \subset J_ i, and
E \to P factors through P'.
The base case is m = n where we can take P' = P.
Induction step. Assume P' works for m. For i \geq m and j \in J'_ i let x_{i, j} \in F_{i + 1}P \cap P' be a homogeneous element of degree k_{i, j} whose image in F_{i + 1}P \cap P'/(F_ iP \cap P') is the generator in the summand corresponding to j \in J_ i. The x_{i, j} generate P'/F_ mP as an A-module. Write
\text{d}(x_{i, j}) = \sum x_{i', j'} a_{i, j}^{i', j'} + y_{i, j}
with y_{i, j} \in F_ mP and a_{i, j}^{i', j'} \in A. There exists a finite subset J'_{m - 1} \subset J_{m - 1} such that each y_{i, j} maps to an element of the submodule \bigoplus _{j \in J'_{m - 1}} A[k_{m - 1, j}] of F_ mP/F_{m - 1}P. Let P'' \subset F_ mP be the inverse image of \bigoplus _{j \in J'_{m - 1}} A[k_{m - 1, j}] under the map F_ mP \to F_ mP/F_{m - 1}P. Then we see that the A-submodule
P'' + \sum x_{i, j}A
is a differential graded submodule of the type we are looking for. Moreover
P'/(P'' + \sum x_{i, j}A) = \bigoplus \nolimits _{j \in J_{m - 1} \setminus J'_{m - 1}} A[k_{m - 1, j}]
Since E is compact, the composition of the given map E \to P' with the quotient map, factors through a finite direct subsum of the module displayed above. Hence after enlarging J'_{m - 1} we may assume E \to P' factors through P'' + \sum x_{i, j}A as desired.
\square
It is not true that every compact object of D(A, \text{d}) comes from a finite graded projective differential graded A-module, see Examples, Section 110.69.
Proposition 22.36.4. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. Let E be an object of D(A, \text{d}). Then the following are equivalent
E is a compact object,
E is a direct summand of an object of D(A, \text{d}) which is represented by a differential graded module P which has a finite filtration F_\bullet by differential graded submodules such that F_ iP/F_{i - 1}P are finite direct sums of shifts of A.
Proof.
Assume E is compact. By Lemma 22.20.4 we may assume that E is represented by a differential graded A-module P with property (P). Consider the distinguished triangle
\bigoplus F_ iP \to \bigoplus F_ iP \to P \xrightarrow {\delta } \bigoplus F_ iP[1]
coming from the admissible short exact sequence of Lemma 22.20.1. Since E is compact we have \delta = \sum _{i = 1, \ldots , n} \delta _ i for some \delta _ i : P \to F_ iP[1]. Since the composition of \delta with the map \bigoplus F_ iP[1] \to \bigoplus F_ iP[1] is zero (Derived Categories, Lemma 13.4.1) it follows that \delta = 0 (follows as \bigoplus F_ iP \to \bigoplus F_ iP maps the summand F_ iP via the difference of \text{id} and the inclusion map into F_{i - 1}P). Thus we see that the identity on E factors through \bigoplus F_ iP in D(A, \text{d}) (by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.4.11). Next, we use that P is compact again to see that the map E \to \bigoplus F_ iP factors through \bigoplus _{i = 1, \ldots , n} F_ iP for some n. In other words, the identity on E factors through \bigoplus _{i = 1, \ldots , n} F_ iP. By Lemma 22.36.3 we see that the identity of E factors as E \to P \to E where P is as in part (2) of the statement of the lemma. In other words, we have proven that (1) implies (2).
Assume (2). By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.37.2 it suffices to show that P gives a compact object. Observe that P has property (P), hence we have
\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(P, M) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(A, \text{d})}(P, M)
for any differential graded module M by Lemma 22.22.3. As direct sums in D(A, \text{d}) are given by direct sums of graded modules (Lemma 22.22.4) we reduce to showing that \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(A, \text{d})}(P, M) commutes with direct sums. Using that K(A, \text{d}) is a triangulated category, that \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits is a cohomological functor in the first variable, and the filtration on P, we reduce to the case that P is a finite direct sum of shifts of A. Thus we reduce to the case P = A[k] which is clear.
\square
Lemma 22.36.5. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. For every compact object E of D(A, \text{d}) there exist integers a \leq b such that \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(E, M) = 0 if H^ i(M) = 0 for i \in [a, b].
Proof.
Observe that the collection of objects of D(A, \text{d}) for which such a pair of integers exists is a saturated, strictly full triangulated subcategory of D(A, \text{d}). Thus by Proposition 22.36.4 it suffices to prove this when E is represented by a differential graded module P which has a finite filtration F_\bullet by differential graded submodules such that F_ iP/F_{i - 1}P are finite direct sums of shifts of A. Using the compatibility with triangles, we see that it suffices to prove it for P = A. In this case \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(A, M) = H^0(M) and the result holds with a = b = 0.
\square
If (A, \text{d}) is just an algebra placed in degree 0 with zero differential or more generally lives in only a finite number of degrees, then we do obtain the more precise description of compact objects.
Lemma 22.36.6. Let (A, \text{d}) be a differential graded algebra. Assume that A^ n = 0 for |n| \gg 0. Let E be an object of D(A, \text{d}). The following are equivalent
E is a compact object, and
E can be represented by a differential graded A-module P which is finite projective as a graded A-module and satisfies \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(A, \text{d})}(P, M) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(P, M) for every differential graded A-module M.
Proof.
Let \mathcal{D} \subset K(A, \text{d}) be the triangulated subcategory discussed in Remark 22.36.1. Let P be an object of \mathcal{D} which is finite projective as a graded A-module. Then P represents a compact object of D(A, \text{d}) by Remark 22.36.2.
To prove the converse, let E be a compact object of D(A, \text{d}). Fix a \leq b as in Lemma 22.36.5. After decreasing a and increasing b if necessary, we may also assume that H^ i(E) = 0 for i \not\in [a, b] (this follows from Proposition 22.36.4 and our assumption on A). Moreover, fix an integer c > 0 such that A^ n = 0 if |n| \geq c.
By Proposition 22.36.4 we see that E is a direct summand, in D(A, \text{d}), of a differential graded A-module P which has a finite filtration F_\bullet by differential graded submodules such that F_ iP/F_{i - 1}P are finite direct sums of shifts of A. In particular, P has property (P) and we have \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(P, M) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(A, \text{d})}(P, M) for any differential graded module M by Lemma 22.22.3. In other words, P is an object of the triangulated subcategory \mathcal{D} \subset K(A, \text{d}) discussed in Remark 22.36.1. Note that P is finite free as a graded A-module.
Choose n > 0 such that b + 4c - n < a. Represent the projector onto E by an endomorphism \varphi : P \to P of differential graded A-modules. Consider the distinguished triangle
P \xrightarrow {1 - \varphi } P \to C \to P[1]
in K(A, \text{d}) where C is the cone of the first arrow. Then C is an object of \mathcal{D}, we have C \cong E \oplus E[1] in D(A, \text{d}), and C is a finite graded free A-module. Next, consider a distinguished triangle
C[1] \to C \to C' \to C[2]
in K(A, \text{d}) where C' is the cone on a morphism C[1] \to C representing the composition
C[1] \cong E[1] \oplus E[2] \to E[1] \to E \oplus E[1] \cong C
in D(A, \text{d}). Then we see that C' represents E \oplus E[2]. Continuing in this manner we see that we can find a differential graded A-module P which is an object of \mathcal{D}, is a finite free as a graded A-module, and represents E \oplus E[n].
Choose a basis x_ i, i \in I of homogeneous elements for P as an A-module. Let d_ i = \deg (x_ i). Let P_1 be the A-submodule of P generated by x_ i and \text{d}(x_ i) for d_ i \leq a - c - 1. Let P_2 be the A-submodule of P generated by x_ i and \text{d}(x_ i) for d_ i \geq b - n + c. We observe
P_1 and P_2 are differential graded submodules of P,
P_1^ t = 0 for t \geq a,
P_1^ t = P^ t for t \leq a - 2c,
P_2^ t = 0 for t \leq b - n,
P_2^ t = P^ t for t \geq b - n + 2c.
As b - n + 2c \geq a - 2c by our choice of n we obtain a short exact sequence of differential graded A-modules
0 \to P_1 \cap P_2 \to P_1 \oplus P_2 \xrightarrow {\pi } P \to 0
Since P is projective as a graded A-module this is an admissible short exact sequence (Lemma 22.16.1). Hence we obtain a boundary map \delta : P \to (P_1 \cap P_2)[1] in K(A, \text{d}), see Lemma 22.7.2. Since P = E \oplus E[n] and since P_1 \cap P_2 lives in degrees (b - n, a) we find that \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A, \text{d})}(E \oplus E[n], (P_1 \cap P_2)[1]) is zero. Therefore \delta = 0 as a morphism in K(A, \text{d}) as P is an object of \mathcal{D}. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.4.11 we can find a map s : P \to P_1 \oplus P_2 such that \pi \circ s = \text{id}_ P + \text{d}h + h\text{d} for some h : P \to P of degree -1. Since P_1 \oplus P_2 \to P is surjective and since P is projective as a graded A-module we can choose a homogeneous lift \tilde h : P \to P_1 \oplus P_2 of h. Then we change s into s + \text{d} \tilde h + \tilde h \text{d} to get \pi \circ s = \text{id}_ P. This means we obtain a direct sum decomposition P = s^{-1}(P_1) \oplus s^{-1}(P_2). Since s^{-1}(P_2) is equal to P in degrees \geq b - n + 2c we see that s^{-1}(P_2) \to P \to E is a quasi-isomorphism, i.e., an isomorphism in D(A, \text{d}). This finishes the proof.
\square
Comments (0)