Definition 12.4.1. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a preadditive category. We say $\mathcal{C}$ is Karoubian if every idempotent endomorphism of an object of $\mathcal{C}$ has a kernel.
12.4 Karoubian categories
Skip this section on a first reading.
The dual notion would be that every idempotent endomorphism of an object has a cokernel. However, in view of the (dual of the) following lemma that would be an equivalent notion.
Lemma 12.4.2. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a preadditive category. The following are equivalent
$\mathcal{C}$ is Karoubian,
every idempotent endomorphism of an object of $\mathcal{C}$ has a cokernel, and
given an idempotent endomorphism $p : z \to z$ of $\mathcal{C}$ there exists a direct sum decomposition $z = x \oplus y$ such that $p$ corresponds to the projection onto $y$.
Proof. Assume (1) and let $p : z \to z$ be as in (3). Let $x = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(p)$ and $y = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(1 - p)$. There are maps $x \to z$ and $y \to z$. Since $(1 - p)p = 0$ we see that $p : z \to z$ factors through $y$, hence we obtain a morphism $z \to y$. Similarly we obtain a morphism $z \to x$. We omit the verification that these four morphisms induce an isomorphism $x = y \oplus z$ as in Remark 12.3.6. Thus (1) $\Rightarrow $ (3). The implication (2) $\Rightarrow $ (3) is dual. Finally, condition (3) implies (1) and (2) by Lemma 12.3.10. $\square$
Lemma 12.4.3. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a preadditive category.
If $\mathcal{D}$ has countable products and kernels of maps which have a right inverse, then $\mathcal{D}$ is Karoubian.
If $\mathcal{D}$ has countable coproducts and cokernels of maps which have a left inverse, then $\mathcal{D}$ is Karoubian.
Proof. Let $X$ be an object of $\mathcal{D}$ and let $e : X \to X$ be an idempotent. The functor
is representable if and only if $e$ has a kernel. Note that for any abelian group $A$ and idempotent endomorphism $e : A \to A$ we have
where
Moreover, $\Phi $ has the right inverse
Hence (1) holds. The proof of (2) is dual (using the dual definition of a Karoubian category, namely condition (2) of Lemma 12.4.2). $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (1)
Comment #5787 by bouthier on