Loading web-font TeX/Main/Regular

The Stacks project

Lemma 36.12.2. Let \{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} be an fpqc covering of schemes. Let E \in D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X). Let m \in \mathbf{Z}. Then E is m-pseudo-coherent if and only if each Lf_ i^*E is m-pseudo-coherent.

Proof. Pullback always preserves m-pseudo-coherence, see Cohomology, Lemma 20.47.3. Conversely, assume that Lf_ i^*E is m-pseudo-coherent for all i. Let U \subset X be an affine open. It suffices to prove that E|_ U is m-pseudo-coherent. Since \{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} is an fpqc covering, we can find finitely many affine open V_ j \subset X_{a(j)} such that f_{a(j)}(V_ j) \subset U and U = \bigcup f_{a(j)}(V_ j). Set V = \coprod V_ i. Thus we may replace X by U and \{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} by \{ V \to U\} and assume that X is affine and our covering is given by a single surjective flat morphism \{ f : Y \to X\} of affine schemes. In this case the result follows from More on Algebra, Lemma 15.64.15 via Lemmas 36.3.5 and 36.10.2. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.