Lemma 36.12.3. Let \{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} be an fppf covering of schemes. Let E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X). Let m \in \mathbf{Z}. Then E is m-pseudo-coherent if and only if each Lf_ i^*E is m-pseudo-coherent.
Proof. Pullback always preserves m-pseudo-coherence, see Cohomology, Lemma 20.47.3. Conversely, assume that Lf_ i^*E is m-pseudo-coherent for all i. Let U \subset X be an affine open. It suffices to prove that E|_ U is m-pseudo-coherent. Since \{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} is an fppf covering, we can find finitely many affine open V_ j \subset X_{a(j)} such that f_{a(j)}(V_ j) \subset U and U = \bigcup f_{a(j)}(V_ j). Set V = \coprod V_ i. Thus we may replace X by U and \{ f_ i : X_ i \to X\} by \{ V \to U\} and assume that X is affine and our covering is given by a single surjective flat morphism \{ f : Y \to X\} of finite presentation.
Since f is flat the derived functor Lf^* is just given by f^* and f^* is exact. Hence H^ i(Lf^*E) = f^*H^ i(E). Since Lf^*E is m-pseudo-coherent, we see that Lf^*E \in D^-(\mathcal{O}_ Y). Since f is surjective and flat, we see that E \in D^-(\mathcal{O}_ X). Let i \in \mathbf{Z} be the largest integer such that H^ i(E) is nonzero. If i < m, then we are done. Otherwise, f^*H^ i(E) is a finite type \mathcal{O}_ Y-module by Cohomology, Lemma 20.47.9. Then by Descent, Lemma 35.7.2 the \mathcal{O}_ X-module H^ i(E) is of finite type. Thus, after replacing X by the members of a finite affine open covering, we may assume there exists a map
such that H^ i(\alpha ) is a surjection. Let C be the cone of \alpha in D(\mathcal{O}_ X). Pulling back to Y and using Cohomology, Lemma 20.47.4 we find that Lf^*C is m-pseudo-coherent. Moreover H^ j(C) = 0 for j \geq i. Thus by induction on i we see that C is m-pseudo-coherent. Using Cohomology, Lemma 20.47.4 again we conclude. \square
Comments (0)