Theorem 76.36.4 (Stein factorization; Noetherian case). Let S be a scheme. Let f : X \to Y be a proper morphism of algebraic spaces over S with Y locally Noetherian. There exists a factorization
\xymatrix{ X \ar[rr]_{f'} \ar[rd]_ f & & Y' \ar[dl]^\pi \\ & Y & }
with the following properties:
the morphism f' is proper with connected geometric fibres,
the morphism \pi : Y' \to Y is finite,
we have f'_*\mathcal{O}_ X = \mathcal{O}_{Y'},
we have Y' = \underline{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}}_ Y(f_*\mathcal{O}_ X), and
Y' is the normalization of Y in X, see Morphisms, Definition 29.53.3.
Proof.
Let f = \pi \circ f' be the factorization of Lemma 76.36.1. Note that besides the conclusions of Lemma 76.36.1 we also have that f' is separated (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.4.10) and finite type (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.23.6). Hence f' is proper. By Cohomology of Spaces, Lemma 69.20.2 we see that f_*\mathcal{O}_ X is a coherent \mathcal{O}_ Y-module. Hence we see that \pi is finite, i.e., (2) holds.
This proves all but the most interesting assertion, namely that the geometric fibres of f' are connected. It is clear from the discussion above that we may replace Y by Y'. Then Y is locally Noetherian, f : X \to Y is proper, and f_*\mathcal{O}_ X = \mathcal{O}_ Y. Let \overline{y} be a geometric point of Y. At this point we apply the theorem on formal functions, more precisely Cohomology of Spaces, Lemma 69.22.7. It tells us that
\mathcal{O}^\wedge _{Y, \overline{y}} = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ n H^0(X_ n, \mathcal{O}_{X_ n})
where X_ n = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y, \overline{y}}/\mathfrak m_{\overline{y}}^ n) \times _ Y X. Note that X_1 = X_{\overline{y}} \to X_ n is a (finite order) thickening and hence the underlying topological space of X_ n is equal to that of X_{\overline{y}}. Thus, if X_{\overline{y}} = T_1 \amalg T_2 is a disjoint union of nonempty open and closed subspaces, then similarly X_ n = T_{1, n} \amalg T_{2, n} for all n. And this in turn means H^0(X_ n, \mathcal{O}_{X_ n}) contains a nontrivial idempotent e_{1, n}, namely the function which is identically 1 on T_{1, n} and identically 0 on T_{2, n}. It is clear that e_{1, n + 1} restricts to e_{1, n} on X_ n. Hence e_1 = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits e_{1, n} is a nontrivial idempotent of the limit. This contradicts the fact that \mathcal{O}^\wedge _{Y, \overline{y}} is a local ring. Thus the assumption was wrong, i.e., X_{\overline{y}} is connected as desired.
\square
Comments (0)