Proof.
If (1) is true then combined with Lemma 67.42.1 we obtain (2). Assume f is quasi-separated and universally closed. Assume given a diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[r] & Y }
as in Definition 67.41.1. A formal argument shows that the existence of the desired diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K') \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[r] & X \ar[d] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A') \ar[r] \ar[rru] & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar[r] & Y }
follows from existence in the case of the morphism X_ A \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A). Since being quasi-separated and universally closed are preserved by base change, the lemma follows from the result in the next paragraph.
Consider a solid diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[r]_-x \ar[d] & X \ar[d]^ f \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \ar@{=}[r] \ar@{..>}[ru] & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) }
where A is a valuation ring with field of fractions K. By Lemma 67.8.9 and the fact that f is quasi-separated we have that the morphism x is quasi-compact. Since f is universally closed, we have in particular that |f|(\overline{\{ x\} }) is closed in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A). Since this image contains the generic point of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) there exists a point x' \in |X| in the closure of x mapping to the closed point of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A). By Lemma 67.16.5 we can find a commutative diagram
\xymatrix{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K') \ar[r] \ar[d] & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(K) \ar[d] \\ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A') \ar[r] & X }
such that the closed point of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A') maps to x' \in |X|. It follows that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) maps the closed point to the closed point, i.e., A' dominates A and this finishes the proof.
\square
Comments (0)