Lemma 87.13.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Suppose given a directed set $\Lambda $ and a system of algebraic spaces $(X_\lambda , f_{\lambda \mu })$ over $\Lambda $ where each $f_{\lambda \mu } : X_\lambda \to X_\mu $ is a thickening. Then $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{\lambda \in \Lambda } X_\lambda $ is a formal algebraic space over $S$.

## 87.13 Colimits of algebraic spaces along thickenings

A special type of formal algebraic space is one which can globally be written as a cofiltered colimit of algebraic spaces along thickenings as in the following lemma. We will see later (in Section 87.18) that any quasi-compact and quasi-separated formal algebraic space is such a global colimit.

**Proof.**
Since we take the colimit in the category of fppf sheaves, we see that $X$ is a sheaf. Choose and fix $\lambda \in \Lambda $. Choose an étale covering $\{ X_{i, \lambda } \to X_\lambda \} $ where $X_ i$ is an affine scheme over $S$, see Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.6.1. For each $\mu \geq \lambda $ there exists a cartesian diagram

with étale vertical arrows, see More on Morphisms of Spaces, Theorem 76.8.1 (this also uses that a thickening is a surjective closed immersion which satisfies the conditions of the theorem). Moreover, these diagrams are unique up to unique isomorphism and hence $X_{i, \mu } = X_\mu \times _{X_{\mu '}} X_{i, \mu '}$ for $\mu ' \geq \mu $. The morphisms $X_{i, \mu } \to X_{i, \mu '}$ is a thickening as a base change of a thickening. Each $X_{i, \mu }$ is an affine scheme by Limits of Spaces, Proposition 70.15.2 and the fact that $X_{i, \lambda }$ is affine. Set $X_ i = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{\mu \geq \lambda } X_{i, \mu }$. Then $X_ i$ is an affine formal algebraic space. The morphism $X_ i \to X$ is étale because given an affine scheme $U$ any $U \to X$ factors through $X_\mu $ for some $\mu \geq \lambda $ (details omitted). In this way we see that $X$ is a formal algebraic space. $\square$

Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a formal algebraic space over $S$. How does one prove or check that $X$ is a global colimit as in Lemma 87.13.1? To do this we look for maps $i : Z \to X$ where $Z$ is an algebraic space over $S$ and $i$ is surjective and a closed immersion, in other words, $i$ is a thickening. This makes sense as $i$ is representable by algebraic spaces (Lemma 87.11.3) and we can use Bootstrap, Definition 80.4.1 as before.

Example 87.13.2. Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ be a valuation ring, which is $(\pi )$-adically complete for some nonzero $\pi \in \mathfrak m$. Assume also that $\mathfrak m$ is not finitely generated. An example is $A = \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{C}_ p}$ and $\pi = p$ where $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{C}_ p}$ is the ring of integers of the field of $p$-adic complex numbers $\mathbf{C}_ p$ (this is the completion of the algebraic closure of $\mathbf{Q}_ p$). Another example is

and $\pi = t$. Then $X = \text{Spf}(A)$ is an affine formal algebraic space and $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\kappa ) \to X$ is a thickening which corresponds to the weak ideal of definition $\mathfrak m \subset A$ which is however not an ideal of definition.

Remark 87.13.3 (Weak ideals of definition). Let $\mathfrak X$ be a formal scheme in the sense of McQuillan, see Remark 87.2.3. An *weak ideal of definition* for $\mathfrak X$ is an ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X$ such that for all $\mathfrak U \subset \mathfrak X$ affine formal open subscheme the ideal $\mathcal{I}(\mathfrak U) \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X(\mathfrak U)$ is a weak ideal of definition of the weakly admissible topological ring $\mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X(\mathfrak U)$. It suffices to check the condition on the members of an affine open covering. There is a one-to-one correspondence

This correspondence associates to $\mathcal{I}$ the scheme $Z = (\mathfrak X, \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X/\mathcal{I})$ together with the obvious morphism to $\mathfrak X$. A *fundamental system of weak ideals of definition* is a collection of weak ideals of definition $\mathcal{I}_\lambda $ such that on every affine open formal subscheme $\mathfrak U \subset \mathfrak X$ the ideals

form a fundamental system of weak ideals of definition of the weakly admissible topological ring $A$. It suffices to check on the members of an affine open covering. We conclude that the formal algebraic space $h_\mathfrak X$ associated to the McQuillan formal scheme $\mathfrak X$ is a colimit of schemes as in Lemma 87.13.1 if and only if there exists a fundamental system of weak ideals of definition for $\mathfrak X$.

Remark 87.13.4 (Ideals of definition). Let $\mathfrak X$ be a formal scheme à la EGA. An *ideal of definition* for $\mathfrak X$ is an ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X$ such that for all $\mathfrak U \subset \mathfrak X$ affine formal open subscheme the ideal $\mathcal{I}(\mathfrak U) \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X(\mathfrak U)$ is an ideal of definition of the admissible topological ring $\mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X(\mathfrak U)$. It suffices to check the condition on the members of an affine open covering. We do **not** get the same correspondence between ideals of definition and thickenings $Z \to h_\mathfrak X$ as in Remark 87.13.3; an example is given in Example 87.13.2. A *fundamental system of ideals of definition* is a collection of ideals of definition $\mathcal{I}_\lambda $ such that on every affine open formal subscheme $\mathfrak U \subset \mathfrak X$ the ideals

form a fundamental system of ideals of definition of the admissible topological ring $A$. It suffices to check on the members of an affine open covering. Suppose that $\mathfrak X$ is quasi-compact and that $\{ \mathcal{I}_\lambda \} _{\lambda \in \Lambda }$ is a fundamental system of weak ideals of definition. If $A$ is an admissible topological ring then all sufficiently small open ideals are ideals of definition (namely any open ideal contained in an ideal of definition is an ideal of definition). Thus since we only need to check on the finitely many members of an affine open covering we see that $\mathcal{I}_\lambda $ is an ideal of definition for $\lambda $ sufficiently large. Using the discussion in Remark 87.13.3 we conclude that the formal algebraic space $h_\mathfrak X$ associated to the quasi-compact formal scheme $\mathfrak X$ à la EGA is a colimit of schemes as in Lemma 87.13.1 if and only if there exists a fundamental system of ideals of definition for $\mathfrak X$.

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (2)

Comment #1946 by Brian Conrad on

Comment #2000 by Johan on