Lemma 84.13.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated formal algebraic space over $S$. Then $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_\lambda $ for a system of algebraic spaces $(X_\lambda , f_{\lambda \mu })$ over a directed set $\Lambda $ where each $f_{\lambda \mu } : X_\lambda \to X_\mu $ is a thickening.

## 84.13 Quasi-compact and quasi-separated formal algebraic spaces

The following result is due to Yasuda, see [Proposition 3.32, Yasuda].

**Proof.**
By Lemma 84.12.1 we may choose an affine formal algebraic space $Y$ and a representable surjective étale morphism $Y \to X$. Write $Y = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits Y_\lambda $ as in Definition 84.5.1.

Pick $\lambda \in \Lambda $. Then $Y_\lambda \times _ X Y$ is a scheme by Lemma 84.5.11. The reduction (Lemma 84.7.2) of $Y_\lambda \times _ X Y$ is equal to the reduction of $Y_{red} \times _{X_{red}} Y_{red}$ which is quasi-compact as $X$ is quasi-separated and $Y_{red}$ is affine. Therefore $Y_\lambda \times _ X Y$ is a quasi-compact scheme. Hence there exists a $\mu \geq \lambda $ such that $\text{pr}_2 : Y_\lambda \times _ X Y \to Y$ factors through $Y_\mu $, see Lemma 84.5.4. Let $Z_\lambda $ be the scheme theoretic image of the morphism $\text{pr}_2 : Y_\lambda \times _ X Y \to Y_\mu $. This is independent of the choice of $\mu $ and we can and will think of $Z_\lambda \subset Y$ as the scheme theoretic image of the morphism $\text{pr}_2 : Y_\lambda \times _ X Y \to Y$. Observe that $Z_\lambda $ is also equal to the scheme theoretic image of the morphism $\text{pr}_1 : Y \times _ X Y_\lambda \to Y$ since this is isomorphic to the morphism used to define $Z_\lambda $. We claim that $Z_\lambda \times _ X Y = Y \times _ X Z_\lambda $ as subfunctors of $Y \times _ X Y$. Namely, since $Y \to X$ is étale we see that $Z_\lambda \times _ X Y$ is the scheme theoretic image of the morphism

by Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 64.16.3. By the same token, $Y \times _ X Z_\lambda $ is the scheme theoretic image of the morphism

The claim follows. Then $R_\lambda = Z_\lambda \times _ X Y = Y \times _ X Z_\lambda $ together with the morphism $R_\lambda \to Z_\lambda \times _ S Z_\lambda $ defines an étale equivalence relation. In this way we obtain an algebraic space $X_\lambda = Z_\lambda /R_\lambda $. By construction the diagram

is cartesian (because $X$ is the coequalizer of the two projections $R = Y \times _ X Y \to Y$, because $Z_\lambda \subset Y$ is $R$-invariant, and because $R_\lambda $ is the restriction of $R$ to $Z_\lambda $). Hence $X_\lambda \to X$ is representable and a closed immersion, see Spaces, Lemma 62.11.5. On the other hand, since $Y_\lambda \subset Z_\lambda $ we see that $(X_\lambda )_{red} = X_{red}$, in other words, $X_\lambda \to X$ is a thickening. Finally, we claim that

We have $Y \times _ X X_\lambda = Z_\lambda \supset Y_\lambda $. Every morphism $T \to X$ where $T$ is a scheme over $S$ lifts étale locally to a morphism into $Y$ which lifts étale locally into a morphism into some $Y_\lambda $. Hence $T \to X$ lifts étale locally on $T$ to a morphism into $X_\lambda $. This finishes the proof. $\square$

Remark 84.13.2. In this remark we translate the statement and proof of Lemma 84.13.1 into the language of formal schemes à la EGA. Looking at Remark 84.8.4 we see that the lemma can be translated as follows

Every quasi-compact and quasi-separated formal scheme has a fundamental system of ideals of definition.

To prove this we first use the induction principle (reformulated for quasi-compact and quasi-separated formal schemes) of Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.1 to reduce to the following situation: $\mathfrak X = \mathfrak U \cup \mathfrak V$ with $\mathfrak U$, $\mathfrak V$ open formal subschemes, with $\mathfrak V$ affine, and the result is true for $\mathfrak U$, $\mathfrak V$, and $\mathfrak U \cap \mathfrak V$. Pick any ideals of definition $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak U$ and $\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak V$. By our assumption that we have a fundamental system of ideals of definition on $\mathfrak U$ and $\mathfrak V$ and because $\mathfrak U \cap \mathfrak V$ is quasi-compact, we can find ideals of definition $\mathcal{I}' \subset \mathcal{I}$ and $\mathcal{J}' \subset \mathcal{J}$ such that

Let $U \to U' \to \mathfrak U$ and $V \to V' \to \mathfrak V$ be the closed immersions determined by the ideals of definition $\mathcal{I}' \subset \mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak U$ and $\mathcal{J}' \subset \mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak V$. Let $\mathfrak U \cap V$ denote the open subscheme of $V$ whose underlying topological space is that of $\mathfrak U \cap \mathfrak V$. By our choice of $\mathcal{I}'$ there is a factorization $\mathfrak U \cap V \to U'$. We define similarly $U \cap \mathfrak V$ which factors through $V'$. Then we consider

and

Since taking scheme theoretic images of quasi-compact morphisms commutes with restriction to opens (Morphisms, Lemma 29.6.3) we see that $Z_ U \cap \mathfrak V = \mathfrak U \cap Z_ V$. Thus $Z_ U$ and $Z_ V$ glue to a scheme $Z$ which comes equipped with a morphism $Z \to \mathfrak X$. Analogous to the discussion in Remark 84.8.3 we see that $Z$ corresponds to a weak ideal of definition $\mathcal{I}_ Z \subset \mathcal{O}_\mathfrak X$. Note that $Z_ U \subset U'$ and that $Z_ V \subset V'$. Thus the collection of all $\mathcal{I}_ Z$ constructed in this manner forms a fundamental system of weak ideals of definition. Hence a subfamily gives a fundamental system of ideals of definition, see Remark 84.8.4.

Lemma 84.13.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a formal algebraic space over $S$. Then $X$ is an affine formal algebraic space if and only if its reduction $X_{red}$ (Lemma 84.7.2) is affine.

**Proof.**
By Lemmas 84.11.1 and 84.12.1 and Definitions 84.11.3 and 84.12.2 we see that $X$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated. By Yasuda's lemma (Lemma 84.13.1) we can write $X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_\lambda $ as a filtered colimit of thickenings of algebraic spaces. However, each $X_\lambda $ is affine by Limits of Spaces, Lemma 67.15.3 because $(X_\lambda )_{red} = X_{red}$. Hence $X$ is an affine formal algebraic space by definition.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)