The Stacks project

86.17 Rig-étale morphisms

In this section we use the work done in Section 86.16 to define rig-étale morphisms of locally Noetherian algebraic spaces.

Definition 86.17.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of locally Noetherian formal algebraic spaces over $S$. We say $f$ is rig-étale if for every commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ U \ar[d] \ar[r] & V \ar[d] \\ X \ar[r] & Y } \]

with $U$ and $V$ affine formal algebraic spaces, $U \to X$ and $V \to Y$ representable by algebraic spaces and étale, the morphism $U \to V$ corresponds to a rig-étale map of adic Noetherian topological rings.

Let us prove that we can check this condition étale locally on source and target.

Lemma 86.17.2. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of locally Noetherian formal algebraic spaces over $S$. The following are equivalent

  1. $f$ is rig-étale,

  2. for every commutative diagram

    \[ \xymatrix{ U \ar[d] \ar[r] & V \ar[d] \\ X \ar[r] & Y } \]

    with $U$ and $V$ affine formal algebraic spaces, $U \to X$ and $V \to Y$ representable by algebraic spaces and étale, the morphism $U \to V$ corresponds to a rig-étale map in $\textit{WAdm}^{Noeth}$,

  3. there exists a covering $\{ Y_ j \to Y\} $ as in Formal Spaces, Definition 85.7.1 and for each $j$ a covering $\{ X_{ji} \to Y_ j \times _ Y X\} $ as in Formal Spaces, Definition 85.7.1 such that each $X_{ji} \to Y_ j$ corresponds to a rig-étale map in $\textit{WAdm}^{Noeth}$, and

  4. there exist a covering $\{ X_ i \to X\} $ as in Formal Spaces, Definition 85.7.1 and for each $i$ a factorization $X_ i \to Y_ i \to Y$ where $Y_ i$ is an affine formal algebraic space, $Y_ i \to Y$ is representable by algebraic spaces and étale, and $X_ i \to Y_ i$ corresponds to a rig-étale map in $\textit{WAdm}^{Noeth}$.

Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) is Definition 86.17.1. The equivalence of (2), (3), and (4) follows from the fact that being rig-étale is a local property of arrows of $\text{WAdm}^{Noeth}$ by Lemma 86.16.3 and an application of the variant of Formal Spaces, Lemma 85.17.3 for morphisms between locally Noetherian algebraic spaces mentioned in Formal Spaces, Remark 85.17.5. $\square$

To be sure, a rig-étale morphism is locally of finite type.

Lemma 86.17.3. A rig-étale morphism of locally Noetherian formal algebraic spaces is locally of finite type.

Proof. The property $P$ in Lemma 86.16.3 implies the equivalent conditions (a), (b), (c), and (d) in Formal Spaces, Lemma 85.24.6. Hence this follows from Formal Spaces, Lemma 85.24.9. $\square$

Lemma 86.17.4. A rig-étale morphism of locally Noetherian formal algebraic spaces is rig-smooth.

Proof. Follows from the definitions and Lemma 86.8.3. $\square$

Lemma 86.17.5. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ and $g : Z \to Y$ be morphisms of locally Noetherian formal algebraic spaces over $S$. If $f$ is rig-étale and $g$ is adic, then the base change $X \times _ Y Z \to Z$ is rig-étale.

Proof. By Formal Spaces, Remark 85.17.10 and the discussion in Formal Spaces, Section 85.19, this follows from Lemma 86.16.4. $\square$

Lemma 86.17.6. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ and $g : Y \to Z$ be morphisms of locally Noetherian formal algebraic spaces over $S$. If $f$ and $g$ are rig-étale, then so is $g \circ f$.

Proof. By Formal Spaces, Remark 85.17.14 this follows from Lemma 86.16.5. $\square$

Lemma 86.17.7. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ and $g : Y \to Z$ be a morphism of locally Noetherian formal algebraic spaces over $S$. If $g \circ f$ and $g$ are rig-étale, then so is $f$.

Proof. By Formal Spaces, Remark 85.17.18 this follows from Lemma 86.16.6. $\square$

Lemma 86.17.8. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of formal algebraic spaces. Assume that $X$ and $Y$ are locally Noetherian and $f$ is a closed immersion. The following are equivalent

  1. $f$ is rig-smooth,

  2. $f$ is rig-étale,

  3. for every affine formal algebraic space $V$ and every morphism $V \to Y$ which is representable by algebraic spaces and étale the morphism $X \times _ Y V \to V$ corresponds to a surjective morphism $B \to A$ in $\textit{WAdm}^{Noeth}$ whose kernel $J$ has the following property: $I(J/J^2) = 0$ for some ideal of definition $I$ of $B$.

Proof. Let us observe that given $V$ and $V \to Y$ as in (2) without any further assumption on $f$ we see that the morphism $X \times _ Y V \to V$ corresponds to a surjective morphism $B \to A$ in $\textit{WAdm}^{Noeth}$ by Formal Spaces, Lemma 85.24.5.

We have (2) $\Rightarrow $ (1) by Lemma 86.17.4.

Proof of (3) $\Rightarrow $ (2). Assume (3). By Lemma 86.17.2 it suffices to show that the ring maps $B \to A$ occuring in (3) are rig-étale in the sense of Definition 86.16.2. Let $I$ be as in (3). The naive cotangent complex $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{A/B}^\wedge $ of $A$ over $(B, I)$ is the complex of $A$-modules given by putting $J/J^2$ in degree $-1$. Hence $A$ is rig-étale over $(B, I)$ by Definition 86.8.1.

Assume (1) and let $V$ and $B \to A$ be as in (3). By Definition 86.15.1 we see that $B \to A$ is rig-smooth. Choose any ideal of definition $I \subset B$. Then $A$ is rig-smooth over $(B, I)$. As above the complex $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{A/B}^\wedge $ is given by putting $J/J^2$ in degree $-1$. Hence by Lemma 86.4.2 we see that $J/J^2$ is annihilated by a power $I^ n$ for some $n \geq 1$. Since $B$ is adic, we see that $I^ n$ is an ideal of definition of $B$ and the proof is complete. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0AQK. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.