Definition 46.25.1. Let $X$ be a scheme. We say $X$ is *Gorenstein* if $X$ is locally Noetherian and $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is Gorenstein for all $x \in X$.

## 46.25 Gorenstein schemes

This section is the continuation of Dualizing Complexes, Section 45.21.

This definition makes sense because a Noetherian ring is said to be Gorenstein if and only if all of its local rings are Gorenstein, see Dualizing Complexes, Definition 45.21.1.

Lemma 46.25.2. A Gorenstein scheme is Cohen-Macaulay.

**Proof.**
Looking affine locally this follows from the corresponding result in algebra, namely Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 45.21.2.
$\square$

Lemma 46.25.3. A regular scheme is Gorenstein.

**Proof.**
Looking affine locally this follows from the corresponding result in algebra, namely Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 45.21.3.
$\square$

Lemma 46.25.4. Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme.

If $X$ has a dualizing complex $\omega _ X^\bullet $, then

$X$ is Gorenstein $\Leftrightarrow $ $\omega _ X^\bullet $ is an invertible object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$,

$\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is Gorenstein $\Leftrightarrow $ $\omega _{X, x}^\bullet $ is an invertible object of $D(\mathcal{O}_{X, x})$,

$U = \{ x \in X \mid \mathcal{O}_{X, x}\text{ is Gorenstein}\} $ is an open Gorenstein subscheme.

If $X$ is Gorenstein, then $X$ has a dualizing complex if and only if $\mathcal{O}_ X[0]$ is a dualizing complex.

**Proof.**
Looking affine locally this follows from the corresponding result in algebra, namely Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 45.21.4.
$\square$

Lemma 46.25.5. If $f : Y \to X$ is a local complete intersection morphism with $X$ a Gorenstein scheme, then $Y$ is Gorenstein.

**Proof.**
By More on Morphisms, Lemma 36.52.5 it suffices to prove the corresponding statement about ring maps. This is Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 45.21.7.
$\square$

Lemma 46.25.6. The property $\mathcal{P}(S) =$“$S$ is Gorenstein” is local in the syntomic topology.

**Proof.**
Let $\{ S_ i \to S\} $ be a syntomic covering. The scheme $S$ is locally Noetherian if and only if each $S_ i$ is Noetherian, see Descent, Lemma 34.13.1. Thus we may now assume $S$ and $S_ i$ are locally Noetherian. If $S$ is Gorenstein, then each $S_ i$ is Gorenstein by Lemma 46.25.5. Conversely, if each $S_ i$ is Gorenstein, then for each point $s \in S$ we can pick $i$ and $t \in S_ i$ mapping to $s$. Then $\mathcal{O}_{S, s} \to \mathcal{O}_{S_ i, t}$ is a flat local ring homomorphism with $\mathcal{O}_{S_ i, t}$ Gorenstein. Hence $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$ is Gorenstein by Dualizing Complexes, Lemma 45.21.8.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (4)

Comment #1314 by Liran Shaul on

Comment #1316 by Johan on

Comment #2256 by David Hansen on

Comment #2290 by Johan on