The Stacks project

21.36 Global derived hom

Let $(\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}), \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed topos. Let $K, L \in D(\mathcal{O})$. Using the construction of the internal hom in the derived category we obtain a well defined object

\[ R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {O}(K, L) = R\Gamma (\mathcal{C}, R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (K, L)) \]

in $D(\Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O}))$. By Lemma 21.35.1 we have

\[ H^0(R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {O}(K, L)) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O})}(K, L) \]


\[ H^ p(R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {O}(K, L)) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O})}^ p(K, L) \]

If $f : (\mathcal{C}', \mathcal{O}') \to (\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ is a morphism of ringed topoi, then there is a canonical map

\[ R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _\mathcal {O}(K, L) \longrightarrow R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}'}(Lf^*K, Lf^*L) \]

in $D(\Gamma (\mathcal{O}))$ by taking global sections of the map defined in Remark 21.35.11.

Comments (2)

Comment #7487 by Hao Peng on

The appearence of X is weird. Should be

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0B6E. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.