Remark 20.37.3. Let (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) be a ringed space. Let (K_ n) be an inverse system in D(\mathcal{O}_ X). Set K = R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits K_ n. For each n and m let \mathcal{H}^ m_ n = H^ m(K_ n) be the mth cohomology sheaf of K_ n and similarly set \mathcal{H}^ m = H^ m(K). Let us denote \underline{\mathcal{H}}^ m_ n the presheaf
Similarly we set \underline{\mathcal{H}}^ m(U) = H^ m(U, K). By Lemma 20.32.3 we see that \mathcal{H}^ m_ n is the sheafification of \underline{\mathcal{H}}^ m_ n and \mathcal{H}^ m is the sheafification of \underline{\mathcal{H}}^ m. Here is a diagram
In general it may not be the case that \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathcal{H}^ m_ n is the sheafification of \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \underline{\mathcal{H}}^ m_ n. If U \subset X is an open, then we have short exact sequences
by Lemma 20.37.1.
Comments (0)