The Stacks project

Lemma 57.5.4. Let $X$ be a scheme. Given $U, V$ finite étale over $X$ there exists a scheme $W$ finite étale over $X$ such that

\[ \mathop{Mor}\nolimits _ X(X, W) = \mathop{Mor}\nolimits _ X(U, V) \]

and such that the same remains true after any base change.

Proof. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.60.4 there exists a scheme $W$ representing $\mathit{Mor}_ X(U, V)$. (Use that an étale morphism is locally quasi-finite by Morphisms, Lemmas 29.35.6 and that a finite morphism is separated.) This scheme clearly satisfies the formula after any base change. To finish the proof we have to show that $W \to X$ is finite étale. This we may do after replacing $X$ by the members of an étale covering (Descent, Lemmas 35.20.23 and 35.20.6). Thus by Étale Morphisms, Lemma 41.18.3 we may assume that $U = \coprod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} X$ and $V = \coprod _{j = 1, \ldots , m} X$. In this case $W = \coprod _{\alpha : \{ 1, \ldots , n\} \to \{ 1, \ldots , m\} } X$ by inspection (details omitted) and the proof is complete. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0BL7. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.