Lemma 58.5.5. Let X be a connected scheme. Let \overline{x} be a geometric point. The functor
defines a Galois category (Definition 58.3.6).
Lemma 58.5.5. Let X be a connected scheme. Let \overline{x} be a geometric point. The functor
defines a Galois category (Definition 58.3.6).
Proof. After identifying \textit{FÉt}_{\overline{x}} with the category of finite sets (Example 58.5.1) we see that our functor F_{\overline{x}} is nothing but the base change functor for the morphism \overline{x} \to X. Thus we see that \textit{FÉt}_ X has finite limits and finite colimits and that F_{\overline{x}} is exact by Lemma 58.5.2. We will also use that finite limits in \textit{FÉt}_ X agree with the corresponding finite limits in the category of schemes over X, see Remark 58.5.3.
If Y' \to Y is a monomorphism in \textit{FÉt}_ X then we see that Y' \to Y' \times _ Y Y' is an isomorphism, and hence Y' \to Y is a monomorphism of schemes. It follows that Y' \to Y is an open immersion (Étale Morphisms, Theorem 41.14.1). Since Y' is finite over X and Y separated over X, the morphism Y' \to Y is finite (Morphisms, Lemma 29.44.14), hence closed (Morphisms, Lemma 29.44.11), hence it is the inclusion of an open and closed subscheme of Y. It follows that Y is a connected objects of the category \textit{FÉt}_ X (as in Definition 58.3.6) if and only if Y is connected as a scheme. Then it follows from Topology, Lemma 5.7.7 that Y is a finite coproduct of its connected components both as a scheme and in the sense of Definition 58.3.6.
Let Y \to Z be a morphism in \textit{FÉt}_ X which induces a bijection F_{\overline{x}}(Y) \to F_{\overline{x}}(Z). We have to show that Y \to Z is an isomorphism. By the above we may assume Z is connected. Since Y \to Z is finite étale and hence finite locally free it suffices to show that Y \to Z is finite locally free of degree 1. This is true in a neighbourhood of any point of Z lying over \overline{x} and since Z is connected and the degree is locally constant we conclude. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #8806 by ZW on
Comment #9281 by Stacks project on