Definition 53.8.1. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a proper scheme over $k$ having dimension $1$ and $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = k$. Then the genus of $X$ is $g = \dim _ k H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$.
53.8 The genus of a curve
If $X$ is a smooth projective geometrically irreducible curve over a field $k$, then we've previously defined the genus of $X$ as the dimension of $H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$, see Picard Schemes of Curves, Definition 44.6.3. Observe that $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = k$ in this case, see Varieties, Lemma 33.26.2. Let us generalize this as follows.
This is sometimes called the arithmetic genus of $X$. In the literature the arithmetic genus of a proper curve $X$ over $k$ is sometimes defined as
\[ p_ a(X) = 1 - \chi (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = 1 - \dim _ k H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) + \dim _ k H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) \]
This agrees with our definition when it applies because we assume $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = k$. But note that
$p_ a(X)$ can be negative, and
$p_ a(X)$ depends on the base field $k$ and should be written $p_ a(X/k)$.
For example if $k = \mathbf{Q}$ and $X = \mathbf{P}^1_{\mathbf{Q}(i)}$ then $p_ a(X/\mathbf{Q}) = -1$ and $p_ a(X/\mathbf{Q}(i)) = 0$.
The assumption that $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = k$ in our definition has two consequences. On the one hand, it means there is no confusion about the base field. On the other hand, it implies the scheme $X$ is Cohen-Macaulay and equidimensional of dimension $1$ (Lemma 53.6.1). If $\omega _ X$ denotes the dualizing module as in Lemmas 53.4.1 and 53.4.2 we see that
53.8.1.1
\begin{equation} \label{curves-equation-genus} g = \dim _ k H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = \dim _ k H^0(X, \omega _ X) \end{equation}
by duality, see Remark 53.4.3.
If $X$ is proper over $k$ of dimension $\leq 1$ and $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ is not equal to the ground field $k$, instead of using the arithmetic genus $p_ a(X)$ given by the displayed formula above we shall use the invariant $\chi (X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$. In fact, it is advocated in [page 276, FAC] and [Introduction, Hirzebruch] that we should call $\chi (X, \mathcal{O}_ X)$ the arithmetic genus.
Lemma 53.8.2. Let $k'/k$ be a field extension. Let $X$ be a proper scheme over $k$ having dimension $1$ and $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = k$. Then $X_{k'}$ is a proper scheme over $k'$ having dimension $1$ and $H^0(X_{k'}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{k'}}) = k'$. Moreover the genus of $X_{k'}$ is equal to the genus of $X$.
Proof. The dimension of $X_{k'}$ is $1$ for example by Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.3. The morphism $X_{k'} \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k')$ is proper by Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.5. The equality $H^0(X_{k'}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{k'}}) = k'$ follows from Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2. The equality of the genus follows from the same lemma. $\square$
Lemma 53.8.3. Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a proper scheme over $k$ having dimension $1$ and $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = k$. If $X$ is Gorenstein, then where $g$ is the genus of $X$ and $\omega _ X$ is as in Lemma 53.4.1.
\[ \deg (\omega _ X) = 2g - 2 \]
Proof. Immediate from Lemma 53.5.2. $\square$
Lemma 53.8.4. Let $X$ be a smooth proper curve over a field $k$ with $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_ X) = k$. Then where $g$ is the genus of $X$.
\[ \dim _ k H^0(X, \Omega _{X/k}) = g \quad \text{and}\quad \deg (\Omega _{X/k}) = 2g - 2 \]
Proof. By Lemma 53.4.1 we have $\Omega _{X/k} = \omega _ X$. Hence the formulas hold by (53.8.1.1) and Lemma 53.8.3. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)