Lemma 55.9.9. In Situation 55.9.3 let d = \gcd (m_1, \ldots , m_ n). Let D = \sum (m_ i/d) C_ i as an effective Cartier divisor. Then there exists a sequence of effective Cartier divisors
(X_ k)_{red} = Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset \ldots \subset Z_ m = D
such that Z_ j = Z_{j - 1} + C_{i_ j} for some i_ j \in \{ 1, \ldots , n\} for j = 1, \ldots , m and such that H^0(Z_ j, \mathcal{O}_{Z_ j}) is a field finite over k for j = 0, \ldots m.
Proof.
The reduction D_{red} = (X_ k)_{red} = \sum C_ i is connected (Lemma 55.9.4) and proper over k. Hence H^0(D_{red}, \mathcal{O}) is a field and a finite extension of k by Varieties, Lemma 33.9.3. Thus the result for Z_0 = D_{red} = (X_ k)_{red} is true. Suppose that we have already constructed
(X_ k)_{red} = Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset \ldots \subset Z_ t \subset D
with Z_ j = Z_{j - 1} + C_{i_ j} for some i_ j \in \{ 1, \ldots , n\} for j = 1, \ldots , t and such that H^0(Z_ j, \mathcal{O}_{Z_ j}) is a field finite over k for j = 0, \ldots , t. Write Z_ t = \sum a_ i C_ i with 1 \leq a_ i \leq m_ i/d. If a_ i = m_ i/d for all i, then Z_ t = D and the lemma is proved. If not, then a_ i < m_ i/d for some i and it follows that (Z_ t \cdot Z_ t) < 0 by Lemma 55.9.7. This means that (D - Z_ t \cdot Z_ t) > 0 because (D \cdot Z_ t) = 0 by the lemma. Thus we can find an i with a_ i < m_ i/d such that (C_ i \cdot Z_ t) > 0. Set Z_{t + 1} = Z_ t + C_ i and i_{t + 1} = i. Consider the short exact sequence
0 \to \mathcal{O}_ X(-Z_ t)|_{C_ i} \to \mathcal{O}_{Z_{t + 1}} \to \mathcal{O}_{Z_ t} \to 0
of Divisors, Lemma 31.14.3. By our choice of i we see that \mathcal{O}_ X(-Z_ t)|_{C_ i} is an invertible sheaf of negative degree on the proper curve C_ i, hence it has no nonzero global sections (Varieties, Lemma 33.44.12). We conclude that H^0(\mathcal{O}_{Z_{t + 1}}) \subset H^0(\mathcal{O}_{Z_ t}) is a field (this is clear but also follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.36.18) and a finite extension of k. Thus we have extended the sequence. Since the process must stop, for example because t \leq \sum (m_ i/d - 1), this finishes the proof.
\square
Comments (0)