Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/BasicLatin.js

The Stacks project

[Lemma 2.6, Artin-Winters]

Lemma 55.9.9. In Situation 55.9.3 let d = \gcd (m_1, \ldots , m_ n). Let D = \sum (m_ i/d) C_ i as an effective Cartier divisor. Then there exists a sequence of effective Cartier divisors

(X_ k)_{red} = Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset \ldots \subset Z_ m = D

such that Z_ j = Z_{j - 1} + C_{i_ j} for some i_ j \in \{ 1, \ldots , n\} for j = 1, \ldots , m and such that H^0(Z_ j, \mathcal{O}_{Z_ j}) is a field finite over k for j = 0, \ldots m.

Proof. The reduction D_{red} = (X_ k)_{red} = \sum C_ i is connected (Lemma 55.9.4) and proper over k. Hence H^0(D_{red}, \mathcal{O}) is a field and a finite extension of k by Varieties, Lemma 33.9.3. Thus the result for Z_0 = D_{red} = (X_ k)_{red} is true. Suppose that we have already constructed

(X_ k)_{red} = Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset \ldots \subset Z_ t \subset D

with Z_ j = Z_{j - 1} + C_{i_ j} for some i_ j \in \{ 1, \ldots , n\} for j = 1, \ldots , t and such that H^0(Z_ j, \mathcal{O}_{Z_ j}) is a field finite over k for j = 0, \ldots , t. Write Z_ t = \sum a_ i C_ i with 1 \leq a_ i \leq m_ i/d. If a_ i = m_ i/d for all i, then Z_ t = D and the lemma is proved. If not, then a_ i < m_ i/d for some i and it follows that (Z_ t \cdot Z_ t) < 0 by Lemma 55.9.7. This means that (D - Z_ t \cdot Z_ t) > 0 because (D \cdot Z_ t) = 0 by the lemma. Thus we can find an i with a_ i < m_ i/d such that (C_ i \cdot Z_ t) > 0. Set Z_{t + 1} = Z_ t + C_ i and i_{t + 1} = i. Consider the short exact sequence

0 \to \mathcal{O}_ X(-Z_ t)|_{C_ i} \to \mathcal{O}_{Z_{t + 1}} \to \mathcal{O}_{Z_ t} \to 0

of Divisors, Lemma 31.14.3. By our choice of i we see that \mathcal{O}_ X(-Z_ t)|_{C_ i} is an invertible sheaf of negative degree on the proper curve C_ i, hence it has no nonzero global sections (Varieties, Lemma 33.44.12). We conclude that H^0(\mathcal{O}_{Z_{t + 1}}) \subset H^0(\mathcal{O}_{Z_ t}) is a field (this is clear but also follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.36.18) and a finite extension of k. Thus we have extended the sequence. Since the process must stop, for example because t \leq \sum (m_ i/d - 1), this finishes the proof. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.