Lemma 53.20.12. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. Assume that f is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1. Let x \in X be a point which is a singular point of the fibre X_ s. Then there exists a commutative diagram of schemes
\xymatrix{ X \ar[d] & U \ar[rr] \ar[l] \ar[rd] & & W \ar[r] \ar[ld] & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}[u, v, a]/(uv - a)) \ar[d] \\ S & & V \ar[ll] \ar[rr] & & \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}[a]) }
with X \leftarrow U, S \leftarrow V, and U \to W étale morphisms, and with the right hand square cartesian, such that there exists a point u \in U mapping to x in X.
Proof.
We first use absolute Noetherian approximation to reduce to the case of schemes of finite type over \mathbf{Z}. The question is local on X and S. Hence we may assume that X and S are affine. Then we can write S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) and write R as a filtered colimit R = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits R_ i of finite type \mathbf{Z}-algebras. Using Limits, Lemma 32.10.1 we can find an i and a morphism f_ i : X_ i \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_ i) whose base change to S is f. After increasing i we may assume that f_ i is at-worst-nodal of relative dimension 1, see Lemma 53.20.10. The image x_ i \in X_ i of x will be a singular point of its fibre, for example because the formation of \text{Sing}(f) commutes with base change (Divisors, Lemma 31.10.1). If we can prove the lemma for f_ i : X_ i \to S_ i and x_ i, then the lemma follows for f : X \to S by base change. Thus we reduce to the case studied in the next paragraph.
Assume S is of finite type over \mathbf{Z}. Let s \in S be the image of x. Recall that \kappa (x) is a finite separable extension of \kappa (s), for example because \text{Sing}(f) \to S is unramified or because x is a node of the fibre X_ s and we can apply Lemma 53.19.7. Furthermore, let \kappa '/\kappa (x) be the degree 2 separable algebra associated to \mathcal{O}_{X_ s, x} in Remark 53.19.8. By More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.35.2 we can choose an étale neighbourhood (V, v) \to (S, s) such that the extension \kappa (v)/\kappa (s) realizes either the extension \kappa (x)/\kappa (s) in case \kappa ' \cong \kappa (x) \times \kappa (x) or the extension \kappa '/\kappa (s) if \kappa ' is a field. After replacing X by X \times _ S V and S by V we reduce to the situation described in the next paragraph.
Assume S is of finite type over \mathbf{Z} and x \in X_ s is a split node, see Definition 53.19.10. By Lemma 53.20.11 we see that there exists an \mathcal{O}_{S, s}-algebra isomorphism
\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge \cong \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge [[s, t]]/(st - h)
for some h \in \mathfrak m_ s^\wedge \subset \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge . In other words, if we consider the homomorphism
\sigma : \mathbf{Z}[a] \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge
sending a to h, then there exists an \mathcal{O}_{S, s}-algebra isomorphism
\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma , y_\sigma }^\wedge
where
Y_\sigma = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}[u, v, t]/(uv - a)) \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathbf{Z}[a]), \sigma } \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge )
and y_\sigma is the point of Y_\sigma lying over the closed point of \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge ) and having coordinates u, v equal to zero. Since \mathcal{O}_{S, s} is a G-ring by More on Algebra, Proposition 15.50.12 we may apply More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.39.3 to conclude.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #5115 by Tongmu He on
Comment #5322 by Johan on