Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 55.11.8. In Situation 55.9.3 assume X is a minimal model, \gcd (m_1, \ldots , m_ n) = 1, and H^0((X_ k)_{red}, \mathcal{O}) = k. Then the map

H^1(X_ k, \mathcal{O}_{X_ k}) \to H^1((X_ k)_{red}, \mathcal{O}_{(X_ k)_{red}})

is surjective and has a nontrivial kernel as soon as (X_ k)_{red} \not= X_ k.

Proof. By vanishing of cohomology in degrees \geq 2 over X_ k (Cohomology, Proposition 20.20.7) any surjection of abelian sheaves on X_ k induces a surjection on H^1. Consider the sequence

(X_ k)_{red} = Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset \ldots \subset Z_ m = X_ k

of Lemma 55.9.9. Since the field maps H^0(Z_ j, \mathcal{O}_{Z_ j}) \to H^0((X_ k)_{red}, \mathcal{O}_{(X_ k)_{red}}) = k are injective we conclude that H^0(Z_ j, \mathcal{O}_{Z_ j}) = k for j = 0, \ldots , m. It follows that H^0(X_ k, \mathcal{O}_{X_ k}) \to H^0(Z_{m - 1}, \mathcal{O}_{Z_{m - 1}}) is surjective. Let C = C_{i_ m}. Then X_ k = Z_{m - 1} + C. Let \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{O}_ X(-Z_{m - 1})|_ C. Then \mathcal{L} is an invertible \mathcal{O}_ C-module. As in the proof of Lemma 55.9.9 there is an exact sequence

0 \to \mathcal{L} \to \mathcal{O}_{X_ k} \to \mathcal{O}_{Z_{m - 1}} \to 0

of coherent sheaves on X_ k. We conclude that we get a short exact sequence

0 \to H^1(C, \mathcal{L}) \to H^1(X_ k, \mathcal{O}_{X_ k}) \to H^1(Z_{m - 1}, \mathcal{O}_{Z_{m - 1}}) \to 0

The degree of \mathcal{L} on C over k is

(C \cdot -Z_{m - 1}) = (C \cdot C - X_ k) = (C \cdot C)

Set \kappa = H^0(C, \mathcal{O}_ C) and w = [\kappa : k]. By definition of the degree of an invertible sheaf we see that

\chi (C, \mathcal{L}) = \chi (C, \mathcal{O}_ C) + (C \cdot C) = w(1 - g_ C) + (C \cdot C)

where g_ C is the genus of C. This expression is < 0 as X is minimal and hence C is not an exceptional curve of the first kind (see proof of Lemma 55.11.5). Thus \dim _ k H^1(C, \mathcal{L}) > 0 which finishes the proof. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #2949 by Maciek Zdanowicz on

This is just a little typo, but there's instead of in the formula in the statement of the lemma.


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0CE9. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.