Lemma 36.7.6. Let f : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes. Assume X and Y are quasi-compact and have affine diagonal. Then, denoting
\Phi : D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \to D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ Y))
the right derived functor of f_* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ Y) the diagram
\xymatrix{ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) \ar[d]_\Phi \ar[r] & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \ar[d]^{Rf_*} \\ D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ Y)) \ar[r] & D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ Y) }
is commutative.
Proof.
Observe that the horizontal arrows in the diagram are equivalences of categories by Proposition 36.7.5. Hence we can identify these categories (and similarly for other quasi-compact schemes with affine diagonal). The statement of the lemma is that the canonical map \Phi (K) \to Rf_*(K) is an isomorphism for all K in D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)). Note that if K_1 \to K_2 \to K_3 \to K_1[1] is a distinguished triangle in D(\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)) and the statement is true for two-out-of-three, then it is true for the third.
Let U \subset X be an affine open. Since the diagonal of X is affine, the inclusion morphism j : U \to X is affine (Morphisms, Lemma 29.11.11). Similarly, the composition g = f \circ j : U \to Y is affine. Let \mathcal{I}^\bullet be a K-injective complex in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U). Since j_* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) has an exact left adjoint j^* : \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U) we see that j_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet is a K-injective complex in \mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X), see Derived Categories, Lemma 13.31.9. It follows that
\Phi (j_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet ) = f_*j_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet = g_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet
By Lemma 36.7.1 we see that j_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet represents Rj_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet and g_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet represents Rg_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet . On the other hand, we have Rf_* \circ Rj_* = Rg_*. Hence f_*j_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet represents Rf_*(j_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet ). We conclude that the lemma is true for any complex of the form j_*\mathcal{G}^\bullet with \mathcal{G}^\bullet a complex of quasi-coherent modules on U. (Note that if \mathcal{G}^\bullet \to \mathcal{I}^\bullet is a quasi-isomorphism, then j_*\mathcal{G}^\bullet \to j_*\mathcal{I}^\bullet is a quasi-isomorphism as well since j_* is an exact functor on quasi-coherent modules.)
Let \mathcal{F}^\bullet be a complex of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules. Let T \subset X be a closed subset such that the support of \mathcal{F}^ p is contained in T for all p. We will use induction on the minimal number n of affine opens U_1, \ldots , U_ n such that T \subset U_1 \cup \ldots \cup U_ n. The base case n = 0 is trivial. If n \geq 1, then set U = U_1 and denote j : U \to X the open immersion as above. We consider the map of complexes c : \mathcal{F}^\bullet \to j_*j^*\mathcal{F}^\bullet . We obtain two short exact sequences of complexes:
0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(c) \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet \to \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(c) \to 0
and
0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(c) \to j_*j^*\mathcal{F}^\bullet \to \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(c) \to 0
The complexes \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(c) and \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(c) are supported on T \setminus U \subset U_2 \cup \ldots \cup U_ n and the result holds for them by induction. The result holds for j_*j^*\mathcal{F}^\bullet by the discussion in the preceding paragraph. We conclude by looking at the distinguished triangles associated to the short exact sequences and using the initial remark of the proof.
\square
Comments (0)