The Stacks project

30.27 Grothendieck's existence theorem, III

To state the general version of Grothendieck's existence theorem we introduce a bit more notation. Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring complete with respect to an ideal $I$. Let $f : X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ be a separated finite type morphism of schemes. Set $\mathcal{I} = I\mathcal{O}_ X$. In this situation we let

\[ \textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over } A}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \]

be the full subcategory of $\textit{Coh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ consisting of those coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-modules whose support is proper over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. This is a Serre subcategory of $\textit{Coh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$, see Lemma 30.26.9. Similarly, we let

\[ \textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over } A}(X, \mathcal{I}) \]

be the full subcategory of $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$ consisting of those objects $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ such that the support of $\mathcal{F}_1$ is proper over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. This is a Serre subcategory of $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$ by Lemma 30.26.11 part (1). Since the support of a quotient module is contained in the support of the module, it follows that ( induces a functor
\begin{equation} \label{coherent-equation-completion-functor-proper-over-A} \textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \longrightarrow \textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I}) \end{equation}

We are now ready to state the main theorem of this section.


Theorem 30.27.1 (Grothendieck's existence theorem). Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring complete with respect to an ideal $I$. Let $X$ be a separated, finite type scheme over $A$. Then the functor (

\[ \textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \longrightarrow \textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I}) \]

is an equivalence.

Proof. We will use the equivalence of categories of Lemma 30.9.8 without further mention. For a closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ proper over $A$ in this proof we will say a coherent module on $X$ is “supported on $Z$” if it is annihilated by the ideal sheaf of $Z$ or equivalently if it is the pushforward of a coherent module on $Z$. By Proposition 30.25.4 we know that the result is true for the functor between coherent modules and systems of coherent modules supported on $Z$. Hence it suffices to show that every object of $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and every object of $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I})$ is supported on a closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ proper over $A$. This holds by definition for objects of $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. We will prove this statement for objects of $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I})$ using the method of proof of Proposition 30.25.4. We urge the reader to read that proof first.

Consider the collection $\Xi $ of quasi-coherent sheaves of ideals $\mathcal{K} \subset \mathcal{O}_ X$ such that the statement holds for every object $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ of $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I})$ annihilated by $\mathcal{K}$. We want to show $(0)$ is in $\Xi $. If not, then since $X$ is Noetherian there exists a maximal quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{K}$ not in $\Xi $, see Lemma 30.10.1. After replacing $X$ by the closed subscheme of $X$ corresponding to $\mathcal{K}$ we may assume that every nonzero $\mathcal{K}$ is in $\Xi $. Let $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ be an object of $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I})$. We will show that this object is supported on a closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ proper over $A$, thereby completing the proof of the theorem.

Apply Chow's lemma (Lemma 30.18.1) to find a proper surjective morphism $f : Y \to X$ which is an isomorphism over a dense open $U \subset X$ such that $Y$ is H-quasi-projective over $A$. Choose an open immersion $j : Y \to Y'$ with $Y'$ projective over $A$, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.43.11. Observe that

\[ \text{Supp}(f^*\mathcal{F}_ n) = f^{-1}\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_ n) = f^{-1}\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_1) \]

The first equality by Morphisms, Lemma 29.5.3. By assumption and Lemma 30.26.5 part (3) we see that $f^{-1}\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_1)$ is proper over $A$. Hence the image of $f^{-1}\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_1)$ under $j$ is closed in $Y'$ by Lemma 30.26.5 part (1). Thus $\mathcal{F}'_ n = j_*f^*\mathcal{F}_ n$ is coherent on $Y'$ by Lemma 30.9.11. It follows that $(\mathcal{F}_ n')$ is an object of $\textit{Coh}(Y', I\mathcal{O}_{Y'})$. By the projective case of Grothendieck's existence theorem (Lemma 30.24.3) there exists a coherent $\mathcal{O}_{Y'}$-module $\mathcal{F}'$ and an isomorphism $(\mathcal{F}')^\wedge \cong (\mathcal{F}'_ n)$ in $\textit{Coh}(Y', I\mathcal{O}_{Y'})$. Since $\mathcal{F}'/I\mathcal{F}' = \mathcal{F}'_1$ we see that

\[ \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}') \cap V(I\mathcal{O}_{Y'}) = \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}'_1) = j(f^{-1}\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_1)) \]

The structure morphism $p' : Y' \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ is proper, hence $p'(\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}') \setminus j(Y))$ is closed in $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. A nonempty closed subset of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ contains a point of $V(I)$ as $I$ is contained in the Jacobson radical of $A$ by Algebra, Lemma 10.96.6. The displayed equation shows that $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}') \cap (p')^{-1}V(I) \subset j(Y)$ hence we conclude that $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}') \subset j(Y)$. Thus $\mathcal{F}'|_ Y = j^*\mathcal{F}'$ is supported on a closed subscheme $Z'$ of $Y$ proper over $A$ and $(\mathcal{F}'|_ Y)^\wedge = (f^*\mathcal{F}_ n)$.

Let $\mathcal{K}$ be the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals cutting out the reduced complement $X \setminus U$. By Proposition 30.19.1 the $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module $\mathcal{H} = f_*(\mathcal{F}'|_ Y)$ is coherent and by Lemma 30.25.3 there exists a morphism $\alpha : (\mathcal{F}_ n) \to \mathcal{H}^\wedge $ of $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$ whose kernel and cokernel are annihilated by a power $\mathcal{K}^ t$ of $\mathcal{K}$. We obtain an exact sequence

\[ 0 \to \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\alpha ) \to (\mathcal{F}_ n) \to \mathcal{H}^\wedge \to \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\alpha ) \to 0 \]

in $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathcal{I})$. If $Z_0 \subset X$ is the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{H}$, then it is clear that $Z_0 \subset f(Z')$ set-theoretically. Hence $Z_0$ is proper over $A$ by Lemma 30.26.3 and Lemma 30.26.5 part (2). Hence $\mathcal{H}^\wedge $ is in the subcategory defined in Lemma 30.26.11 part (2) and a fortiori in $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I})$. We conclude that $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\alpha )$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\alpha )$ are in $\textit{Coh}_{\text{support proper over }A}(X, \mathcal{I})$ by Lemma 30.26.11 part (1). By induction hypothesis, more precisely because $\mathcal{K}^ t$ is in $\Xi $, we see that $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\alpha )$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\alpha )$ are in the subcategory defined in Lemma 30.26.11 part (2). Since this is a Serre subcategory by the lemma, we conclude that the same is true for $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ which is what we wanted to show. $\square$

Remark 30.27.2 (Unwinding Grothendieck's existence theorem). Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring complete with respect to an ideal $I$. Write $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ and $S_ n = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/I^ n)$. Let $X \to S$ be a separated morphism of finite type. For $n \geq 1$ we set $X_ n = X \times _ S S_ n$. Picture:

\[ \xymatrix{ X_1 \ar[r]_{i_1} \ar[d] & X_2 \ar[r]_{i_2} \ar[d] & X_3 \ar[r] \ar[d] & \ldots & X \ar[d] \\ S_1 \ar[r] & S_2 \ar[r] & S_3 \ar[r] & \ldots & S } \]

In this situation we consider systems $(\mathcal{F}_ n, \varphi _ n)$ where

  1. $\mathcal{F}_ n$ is a coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X_ n}$-module,

  2. $\varphi _ n : i_ n^*\mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \to \mathcal{F}_ n$ is an isomorphism, and

  3. $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}_1)$ is proper over $S_1$.

Theorem 30.27.1 says that the completion functor

\[ \begin{matrix} \text{coherent }\mathcal{O}_ X\text{-modules }\mathcal{F} \\ \text{with support proper over }A \end{matrix} \quad \longrightarrow \quad \begin{matrix} \text{systems }(\mathcal{F}_ n) \\ \text{as above} \end{matrix} \]

is an equivalence of categories. In the special case that $X$ is proper over $A$ we can omit the conditions on the supports.

Comments (0)

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0CYW. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.