The Stacks project

Lemma 91.14.3. In the situation above assume that $X$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated and that $DQ_ X(\mathcal{F}) \to DQ_ X(\mathcal{G})$ (Derived Categories of Spaces, Section 75.19) is an isomorphism. Then the functor $F$ is an equivalence of categories.

Proof. Recall that $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{X/B}$ is an object of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$, see More on Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 76.21.4. Hence our assumption implies the maps

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ i_ X(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{X/B}, \mathcal{F}) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ i_ X(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{X/B}, \mathcal{G}) \]

are isomorphisms for all $i$. This implies our functor is fully faithful by Lemma 91.13.1. On the other hand, the functor is essentially surjective by Lemma 91.13.3 because we have the solutions $\mathcal{O}_ X \oplus \mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{O}_ X \oplus \mathcal{G}$ in both categories. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0D3P. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.