Lemma 101.32.3. Let \mathcal{X} be an algebraic stack. Assume \mathcal{X} is quasi-DM with separated diagonal (equivalently \mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \to \mathcal{X} is locally quasi-finite and separated). Let x \in |\mathcal{X}|. Then there exists a morphism of algebraic stacks
\mathcal{U} \longrightarrow \mathcal{X}
with the following properties
there exists a point u \in |\mathcal{U}| mapping to x,
\mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{X} is representable by algebraic spaces and étale,
\mathcal{U} = [U/R] where (U, R, s, t, c) is a groupoid scheme with U, R affine, and s, t finite, flat, and locally of finite presentation.
Proof.
(The parenthetical statement follows from the equivalences in Lemma 101.6.1). Choose an affine scheme U and a flat, locally finitely presented, locally quasi-finite morphism U \to \mathcal{X} such that x is the image of some point u \in U. This is possible by Theorem 101.21.3 and the assumption that \mathcal{X} is quasi-DM. Let (U, R, s, t, c) be the groupoid in algebraic spaces we obtain by setting R = U \times _\mathcal {X} U, see Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.16.1. Let \mathcal{X}' \subset \mathcal{X} be the open substack corresponding to the open image of |U| \to |\mathcal{X}| (Properties of Stacks, Lemmas 100.4.7 and 100.9.12). Clearly, we may replace \mathcal{X} by the open substack \mathcal{X}'. Thus we may assume U \to \mathcal{X} is surjective and then Algebraic Stacks, Remark 94.16.3 gives \mathcal{X} = [U/R]. Observe that s, t : R \to U are flat, locally of finite presentation, and locally quasi-finite. Since R = U \times U \times _{(\mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X})} \mathcal{X} and since the diagonal of \mathcal{X} is separated, we find that R is separated. Hence s, t : R \to U are separated. It follows that R is a scheme by Morphisms of Spaces, Proposition 67.50.2 applied to s : R \to U.
Above we have verified all the assumptions of More on Groupoids in Spaces, Lemma 79.15.13 are satisfied for (U, R, s, t, c) and u. Hence we can find an elementary étale neighbourhood (U', u') \to (U, u) such that the restriction R' of R to U' is quasi-split over u. Note that R' = U' \times _\mathcal {X} U' (small detail omitted; hint: transitivity of fibre products). Replacing (U, R, s, t, c) by (U', R', s', t', c') and shrinking \mathcal{X} as above, we may assume that (U, R, s, t, c) has a quasi-splitting over u (the point u is irrelevant from now on as can be seen from the footnote in More on Groupoids in Spaces, Definition 79.15.1). Let P \subset R be a quasi-splitting of R over u. Apply Lemma 101.32.2 to see that
\mathcal{U} = [U/P] \longrightarrow [U/R] = \mathcal{X}
has all the desired properties.
\square
Comments (0)