The Stacks project

Lemma 76.26.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. Assume the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian. The following are equivalent

  1. $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay,

  2. $f$ is flat and for some surjective étale morphism $V \to Y$ where $V$ is a scheme, the fibres of $X_ V \to V$ are Cohen-Macaulay algebraic spaces, and

  3. $f$ is flat and for any étale morphism $V \to Y$ where $V$ is a scheme, the fibres of $X_ V \to V$ are Cohen-Macaulay algebraic spaces.

Given $x \in |X|$ with image $y \in |Y|$ the following are equivalent

  1. $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$, and

  2. $\mathcal{O}_{Y, \overline{y}} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is flat and $\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}/ \mathfrak m_{\overline{y}}\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is Cohen-Macaulay.

Proof. Given an étale morphism $V \to Y$ where $V$ is a scheme choose a scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X \times _ Y V$. Consider the commutative diagram

\[ \xymatrix{ U \ar[d] \ar[r] & V \ar[d] \\ X \ar[r] & Y } \]

Let $u \in U$ with images $x \in |X|$, $y \in |Y|$, and $v \in V$. Then $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$ if and only if $U \to V$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $u$ (by definition). Moreover the morphism $U_ v \to X_ v = (X_ V)_ v$ is surjective étale. Hence the scheme $U_ v$ is Cohen-Macaulay if and only if the algebraic space $X_ v$ is Cohen-Macaulay. Thus the equivalence of (1), (2), and (3) follows from the corresponding equivalence for morphisms of schemes, see More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.22.2 by a formal argument.

Proof of equivalence of (a) and (b). The corresponding equivalence for flatness is Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.30.8. Thus we may assume $f$ is flat at $x$ when proving the equivalence. Consider a diagram and $x, y, u, v$ as above. Then $\mathcal{O}_{Y, \overline{y}} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}$ is equal to the map $\mathcal{O}_{V, v}^{sh} \to \mathcal{O}_{U, u}^{sh}$ on strict henselizations of local rings, see Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.22.1. Thus we have

\[ \mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}}/ \mathfrak m_{\overline{y}}\mathcal{O}_{X, \overline{x}} = (\mathcal{O}_{U, u}/\mathfrak m_ v \mathcal{O}_{U, u})^{sh} \]

by Algebra, Lemma 10.156.4. Thus we have to show that the Noetherian local ring $\mathcal{O}_{U, u}/\mathfrak m_ v \mathcal{O}_{U, u}$ is Cohen-Macaulay if and only if its strict henselization is. This is More on Algebra, Lemma 15.45.9. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0E0W. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.