Lemma 47.26.1. Let $A \to B$ be a faithfully flat map of Noetherian rings. If $K \in D(A)$ and $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B$ is a dualizing complex for $B$, then $K$ is a dualizing complex for $A$.

## 47.26 More on dualizing complexes

Some lemmas which don't fit anywhere else very well.

**Proof.**
Since $A \to B$ is flat we have $H^ i(K) \otimes _ A B = H^ i(K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B)$. Since $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B$ is in $D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(B)$ we first find that $K$ is in $D^ b(A)$ and then we see that $H^ i(K)$ is a finite $A$-module by Algebra, Lemma 10.82.2. Let $M$ be a finite $A$-module. Then

by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.92.2. Since $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B$ has finite injective dimension, say injective-amplitude in $[a, b]$, we see that the right hand side has vanishing cohomology in degrees $> b$. Since $A \to B$ is faithfully flat, we find that $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(M, K)$ has vanishing cohomology in degrees $> b$. Thus $K$ has finite injective dimension by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.66.2. To finish the proof we have to show that the map $A \to R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, K)$ is an isomorphism. For this we again use More on Algebra, Lemma 15.92.2 and the fact that $B \to R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ B(K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B, K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B)$ is an isomorphism. $\square$

Lemma 47.26.2. Let $\varphi : A \to B$ be a homomorphism of Noetherian rings. Assume

$A \to B$ is syntomic and induces a surjective map on spectra, or

$A \to B$ is a faithfully flat local complete intersection, or

$A \to B$ is faithfully flat of finite type with Gorenstein fibres.

Then $K \in D(A)$ is a dualizing complex for $A$ if and only if $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B$ is a dualizing complex for $B$.

**Proof.**
Observe that $A \to B$ satisfies (1) if and only if $A \to B$ satisfies (2) by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.32.5. Observe that in both (2) and (3) the relative dualzing complex $\varphi ^!(A) = \omega _{B/A}^\bullet $ is an invertible object of $D(B)$, see Lemmas 47.25.4 and 47.25.5. Moreover we have $\varphi ^!(K) = K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} \omega _{B/A}^\bullet $ in both cases, see Lemma 47.24.10 for case (3). Thus $\varphi ^!(K)$ is the same as $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B$ up to tensoring with an invertible object of $D(B)$. Hence $\varphi ^!(K)$ is a dualizing complex for $B$ if and only if $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B$ is (as being a dualizing complex is local and invariant under shifts). Thus we see that if $K$ is dualizing for $A$, then $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B$ is dualizing for $B$ by Lemma 47.24.3. To descend the property, see Lemma 47.26.1.
$\square$

Lemma 47.26.3. Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa ) \to (B, \mathfrak n, l)$ be a flat local homorphism of Noetherian rings such that $\mathfrak n = \mathfrak m B$. If $E$ is the injective hull of $\kappa $, then $E \otimes _ A B$ is the injective hull of $l$.

**Proof.**
Write $E = \bigcup E_ n$ as in Lemma 47.7.3. It suffices to show that $E_ n \otimes _{A/\mathfrak m^ n} B/\mathfrak n^ n$ is the injective hull of $l$ over $B/\mathfrak n$. This reduces us to the case where $A$ and $B$ are Artinian local. Observe that $\text{length}_ A(A) = \text{length}_ B(B)$ and $\text{length}_ A(E) = \text{length}_ B(E \otimes _ A B)$ by Algebra, Lemma 10.51.13. By Lemma 47.6.1 we have $\text{length}_ A(E) = \text{length}_ A(A)$ and $\text{length}_ B(E') = \text{length}_ B(B)$ where $E'$ is the injective hull of $l$ over $B$. We conclude $\text{length}_ B(E') = \text{length}_ B(E \otimes _ A B)$. Observe that

where we have used flatness of $A \to B$ and $\mathfrak n = \mathfrak mB$. Thus there is an injective $B$-module map $E \otimes _ A B \to E'$ by Lemma 47.7.2. By equality of lengths shown above this is an isomorphism. $\square$

Lemma 47.26.4. Let $\varphi : A \to B$ be a flat homorphism of Noetherian rings such that for all primes $\mathfrak q \subset B$ we have $\mathfrak p B_\mathfrak q = \mathfrak qB_\mathfrak q$ where $\mathfrak p = \varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak q)$, for example if $\varphi $ is étale. If $I$ is an injective $A$-module, then $I \otimes _ A B$ is an injective $B$-module.

**Proof.**
Étale maps satisfy the assumption by Algebra, Lemma 10.142.5. By Lemma 47.3.7 and Proposition 47.5.9 we may assume $I$ is the injective hull of $\kappa (\mathfrak p)$ for some prime $\mathfrak p \subset A$. Then $I$ is a module over $A_\mathfrak p$. It suffices to prove $I \otimes _ A B = I \otimes _{A_\mathfrak p} B_\mathfrak p$ is injective as a $B_\mathfrak p$-module, see Lemma 47.3.2. Thus we may assume $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa )$ is local Noetherian and $I = E$ is the injective hull of the residue field $\kappa $. Our assumption implies that the Noetherian ring $B/\mathfrak m B$ is a product of fields (details omitted). Thus there are finitely many prime ideals $\mathfrak m_1, \ldots , \mathfrak m_ n$ in $B$ lying over $\mathfrak m$ and they are all maximal ideals. Write $E = \bigcup E_ n$ as in Lemma 47.7.3. Then $E \otimes _ A B = \bigcup E_ n \otimes _ A B$ and $E_ n \otimes _ A B$ is a finite $B$-module with support $\{ \mathfrak m_1, \ldots , \mathfrak m_ n\} $ hence decomposes as a product over the localizations at $\mathfrak m_ i$. Thus $E \otimes _ A B = \prod (E \otimes _ A B)_{\mathfrak m_ i}$. Since $(E \otimes _ A B)_{\mathfrak m_ i} = E \otimes _ A B_{\mathfrak m_ i}$ is the injective hull of the residue field of $\mathfrak m_ i$ by Lemma 47.26.3 we conclude.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)