Lemma 47.26.1. Let A \to B be a faithfully flat map of Noetherian rings. If K \in D(A) and K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B is a dualizing complex for B, then K is a dualizing complex for A.
47.26 More on dualizing complexes
Some lemmas which don't fit anywhere else very well.
Proof. Since A \to B is flat we have H^ i(K) \otimes _ A B = H^ i(K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B). Since K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B is in D^ b_{\textit{Coh}}(B) we first find that K is in D^ b(A) and then we see that H^ i(K) is a finite A-module by Algebra, Lemma 10.83.2. Let M be a finite A-module. Then
by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.99.2. Since K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B has finite injective dimension, say injective-amplitude in [a, b], we see that the right hand side has vanishing cohomology in degrees > b. Since A \to B is faithfully flat, we find that R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(M, K) has vanishing cohomology in degrees > b. Thus K has finite injective dimension by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.69.2. To finish the proof we have to show that the map A \to R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, K) is an isomorphism. For this we again use More on Algebra, Lemma 15.99.2 and the fact that B \to R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ B(K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B, K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B) is an isomorphism. \square
Lemma 47.26.2. Let \varphi : A \to B be a homomorphism of Noetherian rings. Assume
A \to B is syntomic and induces a surjective map on spectra, or
A \to B is a faithfully flat local complete intersection, or
A \to B is faithfully flat of finite type with Gorenstein fibres.
Then K \in D(A) is a dualizing complex for A if and only if K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B is a dualizing complex for B.
Proof. Observe that A \to B satisfies (1) if and only if A \to B satisfies (2) by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.33.5. Observe that in both (2) and (3) the relative dualzing complex \varphi ^!(A) = \omega _{B/A}^\bullet is an invertible object of D(B), see Lemmas 47.25.4 and 47.25.5. Moreover we have \varphi ^!(K) = K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} \omega _{B/A}^\bullet in both cases, see Lemma 47.24.10 for case (3). Thus \varphi ^!(K) is the same as K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B up to tensoring with an invertible object of D(B). Hence \varphi ^!(K) is a dualizing complex for B if and only if K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B is (as being a dualizing complex is local and invariant under shifts). Thus we see that if K is dualizing for A, then K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} B is dualizing for B by Lemma 47.24.3. To descend the property, see Lemma 47.26.1. \square
Lemma 47.26.3. Let (A, \mathfrak m, \kappa ) \to (B, \mathfrak n, l) be a flat local homorphism of Noetherian rings such that \mathfrak n = \mathfrak m B. If E is the injective hull of \kappa , then E \otimes _ A B is the injective hull of l.
Proof. Write E = \bigcup E_ n as in Lemma 47.7.3. It suffices to show that E_ n \otimes _{A/\mathfrak m^ n} B/\mathfrak n^ n is the injective hull of l over B/\mathfrak n. This reduces us to the case where A and B are Artinian local. Observe that \text{length}_ A(A) = \text{length}_ B(B) and \text{length}_ A(E) = \text{length}_ B(E \otimes _ A B) by Algebra, Lemma 10.52.13. By Lemma 47.6.1 we have \text{length}_ A(E) = \text{length}_ A(A) and \text{length}_ B(E') = \text{length}_ B(B) where E' is the injective hull of l over B. We conclude \text{length}_ B(E') = \text{length}_ B(E \otimes _ A B). Observe that
where we have used flatness of A \to B and \mathfrak n = \mathfrak mB. Thus there is an injective B-module map E \otimes _ A B \to E' by Lemma 47.7.2. By equality of lengths shown above this is an isomorphism. \square
Lemma 47.26.4. Let \varphi : A \to B be a flat homorphism of Noetherian rings such that for all primes \mathfrak q \subset B we have \mathfrak p B_\mathfrak q = \mathfrak qB_\mathfrak q where \mathfrak p = \varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak q), for example if \varphi is étale. If I is an injective A-module, then I \otimes _ A B is an injective B-module.
Proof. Étale maps satisfy the assumption by Algebra, Lemma 10.143.5. By Lemma 47.3.7 and Proposition 47.5.9 we may assume I is the injective hull of \kappa (\mathfrak p) for some prime \mathfrak p \subset A. Then I is a module over A_\mathfrak p. It suffices to prove I \otimes _ A B = I \otimes _{A_\mathfrak p} B_\mathfrak p is injective as a B_\mathfrak p-module, see Lemma 47.3.2. Thus we may assume (A, \mathfrak m, \kappa ) is local Noetherian and I = E is the injective hull of the residue field \kappa . Our assumption implies that the Noetherian ring B/\mathfrak m B is a product of fields (details omitted). Thus there are finitely many prime ideals \mathfrak m_1, \ldots , \mathfrak m_ n in B lying over \mathfrak m and they are all maximal ideals. Write E = \bigcup E_ n as in Lemma 47.7.3. Then E \otimes _ A B = \bigcup E_ n \otimes _ A B and E_ n \otimes _ A B is a finite B-module with support \{ \mathfrak m_1, \ldots , \mathfrak m_ n\} hence decomposes as a product over the localizations at \mathfrak m_ i. Thus E \otimes _ A B = \prod (E \otimes _ A B)_{\mathfrak m_ i}. Since (E \otimes _ A B)_{\mathfrak m_ i} = E \otimes _ A B_{\mathfrak m_ i} is the injective hull of the residue field of \mathfrak m_ i by Lemma 47.26.3 we conclude. \square
Comments (0)