Lemma 31.29.2. Let X be an integral locally Noetherian normal scheme. The group of rank 1 coherent reflexive \mathcal{O}_ X-modules is isomorphic to the Weil divisor class group \text{Cl}(X) of X.
Proof. Let \mathcal{F} be a rank 1 coherent reflexive \mathcal{O}_ X-module. Choose an open U \subset X such that every irreducible component of X \setminus U has codimension \geq 2 in X and such that \mathcal{F}|_ U is invertible, see Lemma 31.12.13. Observe that \text{Cl}(U) = \text{Cl}(X) as the Weil divisor class group of X only depends on its field of rational functions and the points of codimension 1 and their local rings. Thus we can define the Weil divisor class of \mathcal{F} to be the Weil divisor class of \mathcal{F}|_ U in \text{Cl}(U). We omit the verification that this is independent of the choice of U.
Denote \text{Cl}'(X) the set of isomorphism classes of rank 1 coherent reflexive \mathcal{O}_ X-modules. The construction above gives a group homorphism
because for any pair \mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G} of elements of \text{Cl}'(X) we can choose a U which works for both and the assignment (31.27.5.1) sending an invertible module to its Weil divisor class is a homorphism. If \mathcal{F} is in the kernel of this map, then we find that \mathcal{F}|_ U is trivial (Lemma 31.27.6) and hence \mathcal{F} is trivial too by Lemma 31.12.12 and Serre's criterion Properties, Lemma 28.12.5. To finish the proof it suffices to check the map is surjective.
Let D = \sum n_ Z Z be a Weil divisor on X. We claim that there is an open U \subset X such that every irreducible component of X \setminus U has codimension \geq 2 in X and such that Z|_ U is an effective Cartier divisor for n_ Z \not= 0. To prove the claim we may assume X is affine. Then we may assume D = n_1 Z_1 + \ldots + n_ r Z_ r is a finite sum with Z_1, \ldots , Z_ r pairwise distinct. After throwing out Z_ i \cap Z_ j for i \not= j we may assume Z_1, \ldots , Z_ r are pairwise disjoint. This reduces us to the case of a single prime divisor Z on X. As X is (R_1) by Properties, Lemma 28.12.5 the local ring \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi } at the generic point \xi of Z is a discrete valuation ring. Let f \in \mathcal{O}_{X, \xi } be a uniformizer. Let V \subset X be an open neighbourhood of \xi such that f is the image of an element f \in \mathcal{O}_ X(V). After shrinking V we may assume that Z \cap V = V(f) scheme theoretically, since this is true in the local ring at \xi . In this case taking
gives the desired open, thereby proving the claim.
In order to show that the divisor class of D is in the image, we may write D = \sum _{n_ Z < 0} n_ Z Z - \sum _{n_ Z > 0} (-n_ Z) Z. By additivity of the map constructed above, we may and do assume n_ Z \leq 0 for all prime divisors Z (this step may be avoided if the reader so desires). Let U \subset X be as in the claim above. If U is quasi-compact, then we write D|_ U = -n_1 Z_1 - \ldots - n_ r Z_ r for pairwise distinct prime divisors Z_ i and n_ i > 0 and we consider the invertible \mathcal{O}_ U-module
where \mathcal{I}_ i is the ideal sheaf of Z_ i. This is invertible by our choice of U and Lemma 31.13.7. Also \text{div}_\mathcal {L}(1) = D|_ U. Since \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{F}|_ U for some rank 1 coherent reflexive \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{F} by Lemma 31.12.12 we find that D is in the image of our map.
If U is not quasi-compact, then we define \mathcal{L} \subset \mathcal{O}_ U locally by the displayed formula above. The reader shows that the construction glues and finishes the proof exactly as before. Details omitted. \square
Comments (0)