In this section we add a few more easier to prove cases.
Proposition 52.23.1. In Situation 52.16.1 let $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ be an object of $\textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U)$. Assume
there exist $f_1, \ldots , f_ d \in I$ such that for $y \in U \cap Y$ the ideal $I\mathcal{O}_{X, y}$ is generated by $f_1, \ldots , f_ d$ and $f_1, \ldots , f_ d$ form a $\mathcal{F}_ y^\wedge $-regular sequence,
$H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_1)$ and $H^1(U, \mathcal{F}_1)$ are finite $A$-modules.
Then $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ extends canonically to $X$. In particular, if $A$ is complete, then $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ is the completion of a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ U$-module.
Proof. We will prove this by verifying hypotheses (a), (b), and (c) of Lemma 52.16.10. For every $n$ we have a short exact sequence
Since $f_1, \ldots , f_ d$ forms a regular sequence (and hence quasi-regular, see Algebra, Lemma 10.69.2) on each of the “stalks” $\mathcal{F}_ y^\wedge $ and since we have $I\mathcal{F}_ n = (f_1, \ldots , f_ d)\mathcal{F}_ n$ for all $n$, we find that
by checking on stalks. Using the assumption of finiteness of $H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_1)$ and induction, we first conclude that $M_ n = H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_ n)$ is a finite $A$-module for all $n$. In this way we see that condition (c) of Lemma 52.16.10 holds. We also see that
is a finite graded $R = \bigoplus I^ n/I^{n +1}$-module. By Cohomology, Lemma 20.35.1 we conclude that condition (a) of Lemma 52.16.10 is satisfied. Finally, condition (b) of Lemma 52.16.10 is satisfied because $\bigoplus H^0(U, I^ n\mathcal{F}_{n + 1})$ is a finite graded $R$-module and we can apply Cohomology, Lemma 20.35.3. $\square$
Remark 52.23.2. In the situation of Proposition 52.23.1 if we assume $A$ has a dualizing complex, then the condition that $H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_1)$ and $H^1(U, \mathcal{F}_1)$ are finite is equivalent to for all $y \in U \cap Y$ and $z \in Z \cap \overline{\{ y\} }$. See Local Cohomology, Lemma 51.12.1. This holds for example if $\mathcal{F}_1$ is a finite locally free $\mathcal{O}_{U \cap Y}$-module, $Y$ is $(S_2)$, and $\text{codim}(Z', Y') \geq 3$ for every pair of irreducible components $Y'$ of $Y$, $Z'$ of $Z$ with $Z' \subset Y'$.
\[ \text{depth}(\mathcal{F}_{1, y}) + \dim (\mathcal{O}_{\overline{\{ y\} }, z}) > 2 \]
Proposition 52.23.3. In Situation 52.16.1 let $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ be an object of $\textit{Coh}(U, I\mathcal{O}_ U)$. Assume there is Noetherian local ring $(R, \mathfrak m)$ and a ring map $R \to A$ such that
$I = \mathfrak m A$,
for $y \in U \cap Y$ the stalk $\mathcal{F}_ y^\wedge $ is $R$-flat,
$H^0(U, \mathcal{F}_1)$ and $H^1(U, \mathcal{F}_1)$ are finite $A$-modules.
Then $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ extends canonically to $X$. In particular, if $A$ is complete, then $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ is the completion of a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ U$-module.
Proof. The proof is exactly the same as the proof of Proposition 52.23.1. Namely, if $\kappa = R/\mathfrak m$ then for $n \geq 0$ there is an isomorphism
and the right hand side is a finite direct sum of copies of $\mathcal{F}_1$. This can be checked by looking at stalks. Everything else is exactly the same. $\square$
Remark 52.23.4. Proposition 52.23.3 is a local version of [Theorem 2.10 (i), Baranovsky]. It is straightforward to deduce the global results from the local one; we will sketch the argument. Namely, suppose $(R, \mathfrak m)$ is a complete Noetherian local ring and $X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is a proper morphism. For $n \geq 1$ set $X_ n = X \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/\mathfrak m^ n)$. Let $Z \subset X_1$ be a closed subset of the special fibre. Set $U = X \setminus Z$ and denote $j : U \to X$ the inclusion morphism. Suppose given an object which is flat over $R$ in the sense that $\mathcal{F}_ n$ is flat over $R/\mathfrak m^ n$ for all $n$. Assume that $j_*\mathcal{F}_1$ and $R^1j_*\mathcal{F}_1$ are coherent modules. Then affine locally on $X$ we get a canonical extension of $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ by Proposition 52.23.3 and formation of this extension commutes with localization (by Lemma 52.16.11). Thus we get a canonical global object $(\mathcal{G}_ n)$ of $\textit{Coh}(X, \mathfrak m\mathcal{O}_ X)$ whose restriction of $U$ is $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$. By Grothendieck's existence theorem (Cohomology of Schemes, Proposition 30.25.4) we see there exists a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module $\mathcal{G}$ whose completion is $(\mathcal{G}_ n)$. In this way we see that $(\mathcal{F}_ n)$ is algebraizable, i.e., it is the completion of a coherent $\mathcal{O}_ U$-module. We add that the coherence of $j_*\mathcal{F}_1$ and $R^1j_*\mathcal{F}_1$ is a condition on the special fibre. Namely, if we denote $j_1 : U_1 \to X_1$ the special fibre of $j : U \to X$, then we can think of $\mathcal{F}_1$ as a coherent sheaf on $U_1$ and we have $j_*\mathcal{F}_1 = j_{1, *}\mathcal{F}_1$ and $R^1j_*\mathcal{F}_1 = R^1j_{1, *}\mathcal{F}_1$. Hence for example if $X_1$ is $(S_2)$ and irreducible, we have $\dim (X_1) - \dim (Z) \geq 3$, and $\mathcal{F}_1$ is a locally free $\mathcal{O}_{U_1}$-module, then $j_{1, *}\mathcal{F}_1$ and $R^1j_{1, *}\mathcal{F}_1$ are coherent modules.
\[ (\mathcal{F}_ n) \text{ of } \textit{Coh}(U, \mathfrak m\mathcal{O}_ U) \]
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)