29.47 Absolute weak normalization and seminormalization
Motivated by the results proved in the previous section we give the following definition.
Definition 29.47.1. Let A be a ring.
We say A is seminormal if for all x, y \in A with x^3 = y^2 there is a unique a \in A with x = a^2 and y = a^3.
We say A is absolutely weakly normal if (a) A is seminormal and (b) for any prime number p and x, y \in A with p^ px = y^ p there is a unique a \in A with x = a^ p and y = pa.
An amusing observation, see [Costa], is that in the definition of seminormal rings it suffices1 to assume the existence of a. Absolutely weakly normal schemes were defined in [Appendix B, rydh_descent].
Lemma 29.47.2. Being seminormal or being absolutely weakly normal is a local property of rings, see Properties, Definition 28.4.1.
Proof.
Suppose that A is seminormal and f \in A. Let x', y' \in A_ f with (x')^3 = (y')^2. Write x' = x/f^{2n} and y' = y/f^{3n} for some n \geq 0 and x, y \in A. After replacing x, y by f^{2m}x, f^{3m}y and n by n + m, we see that x^3 = y^2 in A. Then we find a unique a \in A with x = a^2 and y = a^3. Setting a' = a/f^ n we get x' = (a')^2 and y' = (a')^3 as desired. Uniqueness of a' follows from uniqueness of a. In exactly the same manner the reader shows that if A is absolutely weakly normal, then A_ f is absolutely weakly normal.
Assume A is a ring and f_1, \ldots , f_ n \in A generate the unit ideal. Assume A_{f_ i} is seminormal for each i. Let x, y \in A with x^3 = y^2. For each i we find a unique a_ i \in A_{f_ i} with x = a_ i^2 and y = a_ i^3 in A_{f_ i}. By the uniqueness and the result of the first paragraph (which tells us that A_{f_ if_ j} is seminormal) we see that a_ i and a_ j map to the same element of A_{f_ if_ j}. By Algebra, Lemma 10.24.2 we find a unique a \in A mapping to a_ i in A_{f_ i} for all i. Then x = a^2 and y = a^3 by the same token. Clearly this a is unique. Thus A is seminormal. If we assume A_{f_ i} is absolutely weakly normal, then the exact same argument shows that A is absolutely weakly normal.
\square
Next we define seminormal schemes and absolutely weakly normal schemes.
Definition 29.47.3. Let X be a scheme.
We say X is seminormal if every x \in X has an affine open neighbourhood \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) = U \subset X such that the ring R is seminormal.
We say X is absolutely weakly normal if every x \in X has an affine open neighbourhood \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) = U \subset X such that the ring R is absolutely weakly normal.
Here is the obligatory lemma.
Lemma 29.47.4. Let X be a scheme. The following are equivalent:
The scheme X is seminormal.
For every affine open U \subset X the ring \mathcal{O}_ X(U) is seminormal.
There exists an affine open covering X = \bigcup U_ i such that each \mathcal{O}_ X(U_ i) is seminormal.
There exists an open covering X = \bigcup X_ j such that each open subscheme X_ j is seminormal.
Moreover, if X is seminormal then every open subscheme is seminormal. The same statements are true with “seminormal” replaced by “absolutely weakly normal”.
Proof.
Combine Properties, Lemma 28.4.3 and Lemma 29.47.2.
\square
Lemma 29.47.5. A seminormal scheme or ring is reduced. A fortiori the same is true for absolutely weakly normal schemes or rings.
Proof.
Let A be a ring. If a \in A is nonzero but a^2 = 0, then a^2 = 0^2 and a^3 = 0^3 and hence A is not seminormal.
\square
Lemma 29.47.6. Let A be a ring.
The category of ring maps A \to B inducing a universal homeomorphism on spectra has a final object A \to A^{awn}.
Given A \to B in the category of (1) the resulting map B \to A^{awn} is an isomorphism if and only if B is absolutely weakly normal.
The category of ring maps A \to B inducing isomorphisms on residue fields and a universal homeomorphism on spectra has a final object A \to A^{sn}.
Given A \to B in the category of (3) the resulting map B \to A^{sn} is an isomorphism if and only if B is seminormal.
For any ring map \varphi : A \to A' there are unique maps \varphi ^{awn} : A^{awn} \to (A')^{awn} and \varphi ^{sn} : A^{sn} \to (A')^{sn} compatible with \varphi .
Proof.
We prove (1) and (2) and we omit the proof of (3) and (4) and the final statement. Consider the category of A-algebras of the form
B = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J
where J is a finitely generated ideal such that A \to B defines a universal homeomorphism on spectra. We claim this category is directed (Categories, Definition 4.19.1). Namely, given
B = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J \quad \text{and}\quad B' = A[x_1, \ldots , x_{n'}]/J'
then we can consider
B'' = A[x_1, \ldots , x_{n + n'}]/J''
where J'' is generated by the elements of J and the elements f(x_{n + 1}, \ldots , x_{n + n'}) where f \in J'. Then we have A-algebra homomorphisms B \to B'' and B' \to B'' which induce an isomorphism B \otimes _ A B' \to B''. It follows from Lemmas 29.45.2 and 29.45.3 that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B'') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is a universal homeomorphism and hence A \to B'' is in our category. Finally, given \varphi , \varphi ' : B \to B' in our category with B as displayed above, then we consider the quotient B'' of B' by the ideal generated by \varphi (x_ i) - \varphi '(x_ i), i = 1, \ldots , n. Since \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) we see that \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B'') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') is a bijective closed immersion hence a universal homeomorphism. Thus B'' is in our category and \varphi , \varphi ' are equalized by B' \to B''. This completes the proof of our claim. We set
A^{awn} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits B
where the colimit is over the category just described. Observe that A \to A^{awn} induces a universal homeomorphism on spectra by Lemma 29.46.2 (this is where we use the category is directed).
Given a ring map A \to B of finite presentation inducing a universal homeomorphism on spectra, we get a canonical map B \to A^{awn} by the very construction of A^{awn}. Since every A \to B as in (1) is a filtered colimit of A \to B as in (1) of finite presentation (Lemma 29.46.11), we see that A \to A^{awn} is final in the category (1).
Let x, y \in A^{awn} be elements such that x^3 = y^2. Then A^{awn} \to A^{awn}[t]/(t^2 - x, t^3 - y) induces a universal homeomorphism on spectra by Lemma 29.46.10. Thus A \to A^{awn}[t]/(t^2 - x, t^3 - y) is in the category (1) and we obtain a unique A-algebra map A^{awn}[t]/(t^2 - x, t^3 - y) \to A^{awn}. The image a \in A^{awn} of t is therefore the unique element such that a^2 = x and a^3 = y in A^{awn}. In exactly the same manner, given a prime p and x, y \in A^{awn} with p^ px = y^ p we find a unique a \in A^{awn} with a^ p = x and pq = y. Thus A^{awn} is absolutely weakly normal by definition.
Finally, let A \to B be in the category (1) with B absolutely weakly normal. Since A^{awn} \to B^{awn} induces a universal homeomorphism on spectra and since A^{awn} is reduced (Lemma 29.47.5) we find A^{awn} \subset B^{awn} (see Algebra, Lemma 10.30.6). If this inclusion is not an equality, then Lemma 29.46.6 implies there is an element b \in B^{awn}, b \not\in A^{awn} such that either b^2, b^3 \in A^{awn} or pb, b^ p \in A^{awn} for some prime number p. However, by the existence and uniqueness in Definition 29.47.1 this forces b \in A^{awn} and hence we obtain the contradiction that finishes the proof.
\square
Lemma 29.47.7. Let X be a scheme.
The category of universal homeomorphisms Y \to X has an initial object X^{awn} \to X.
Given Y \to X in the category of (1) the resulting morphism X^{awn} \to Y is an isomorphism if and only if Y is absolutely weakly normal.
The category of universal homeomorphisms Y \to X which induce ismomorphisms on residue fields has an initial object X^{sn} \to X.
Given Y \to X in the category of (3) the resulting morphism X^{sn} \to Y is an isomorphism if and only if Y is seminormal.
For any morphism h : X' \to X of schemes there are unique morphisms h^{awn} : (X')^{awn} \to X^{awn} and h^{sn} : (X')^{sn} \to X^{sn} compatible with h.
Proof.
We will prove (1) and (2) and omit the proof of (3) and (4). Let h : X' \to X be a morphism of schemes. If (1) holds for X and X', then X' \times _ X X^{awn} \to X' is a universal homeomorphism and hence we get a unique morphism (X')^{awn} \to X' \times _ X X^{awn} over X' by the universal property of (X')^{awn} \to X'. Composed with the projection X' \times _ X X^{awn} \to X^{awn} we obtain h^{awn}. If in addition (2) holds for X and X' and h is an open immersion, then X' \times _ X X^{awn} is absolutely weakly normal (Lemma 29.47.4) and we deduce that (X')^{awn} \to X' \times _ X X^{awn} is an isomorphism.
Recall that any universal homeomorphism is affine, see Lemma 29.45.4. Thus if X is affine then (1) and (2) follow immediately from Lemma 29.47.6. Let X be a scheme and let \mathcal{B} be the set of affine opens of X. For each U \in \mathcal{B} we obtain U^{awn} \to U and for V \subset U, V, U \in \mathcal{B} we obtain a canonical isomorphism \rho _{V, U} : V^{awn} \to V \times _ U U^{awn} by the discussion in the previous paragraph. Thus by relative glueing (Constructions, Lemma 27.2.1) we obtain a morphism X^{awn} \to X which restricts to U^{awn} over U compatibly with the \rho _{V, U}. Next, let Y \to X be a universal homeomorphism. Then U \times _ X Y \to U is a universal homeomorphism for U \in \mathcal{B} and we obtain a unique morphism g_ U : U^{awn} \to U \times _ X Y over U. These g_ U are compatible with the morphisms \rho _{V, U}; details omitted. Hence there is a unique morphism g : X^{awn} \to Y over X agreeing with g_ U over U, see Constructions, Remark 27.2.3. This proves (1) for X. Part (2) follows because it holds affine locally.
\square
Definition 29.47.8. Let X be a scheme.
The morphism X^{sn} \to X constructed in Lemma 29.47.7 is the seminormalization of X.
The morphism X^{awn} \to X constructed in Lemma 29.47.7 is the absolute weak normalization of X.
To be sure, the seminormalization X^{sn} of X is a seminormal scheme and the absolute weak normalization X^{awn} is an absolutely weakly normal scheme. Moreover, for any morphism h : Y \to X of schemes we obtain a canonical commutative diagram
\xymatrix{ Y^{awn} \ar[d]^{h^{awn}} \ar[r] & Y^{sn} \ar[d]^{h^{sn}} \ar[r] & Y \ar[d]^ h \\ X^{awn} \ar[r] & X^{sn} \ar[r] & X }
of schemes; the arrows h^{sn} and h^{awn} are the unique ones compatible with h.
Lemma 29.47.9. Let X be a scheme. The following are equivalent
X is seminormal,
X is equal to its own seminormalization, i.e., the morphism X^{sn} \to X is an isomorphism,
if \pi : Y \to X is a universal homeomorphism inducing isomorphisms on residue fields with Y reduced, then \pi is an isomorphism.
Proof.
The equivalence of (1) and (2) is clear from Lemma 29.47.7. If (3) holds, then X^{sn} \to X is an isomorphism and we see that (2) holds.
Assume (2) holds and let \pi : Y \to X be a universal homeomorphism inducing isomorphisms on residue fields with Y reduced. Then there exists a factorization X \to Y \to X of \text{id}_ X by Lemma 29.47.7. Then X \to Y is a closed immersion (by Schemes, Lemma 26.21.11 and the fact that \pi is separated for example by Lemma 29.10.3). Since X \to Y is also a bijection on points, the reducedness of Y shows that it has to be an isomorphism. This finishes the proof.
\square
Lemma 29.47.10. Let X be a scheme. The following are equivalent
X is absolutely weakly normal,
X is equal to its own absolute weak normalization, i.e., the morphism X^{awn} \to X is an isomorphism,
if \pi : Y \to X is a universal homeomorphism with Y reduced, then \pi is an isomorphism.
Proof.
This is proved in exactly the same manner as Lemma 29.47.9.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #8600 by Fanjun Meng on
Comment #9168 by Stacks project on