The Stacks project

Proof. Let $X$ in $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ in $\mathcal{A}_ X$. Let $\xi \in H^{n + 1}_\tau (U, \mathcal{F})$ for some $U/X$. We have to show that $\xi $ restricts to zero on the members of a $\tau '$-covering of $U$. See Lemma 21.7.4. It follows from this that we may replace $U$ by the members of a $\tau '$-covering of $U$.

By locality of cohomology (Lemma 21.7.3) we can choose a $\tau $-covering $\{ U_ i \to U\} $ such that $\xi $ restricts to zero on $U_ i$. Choose $\{ V_ j \to V\} $, $\{ f_ j : W_ j \to V_ j\} $, and $\{ W_{jk} \to W_ j\} $ as in (5). After replacing both $U$ by $V_ j$ and $\mathcal{F}$ by its restriction to $\mathcal{C}_\tau /V_ j$, which is allowed by (1), we reduce to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Here $f : X \to Y$ is an element of $\mathcal{P}$ such that $\{ X \to Y\} $ is a $\tau $-covering, $\mathcal{F}$ is an object of $\mathcal{A}_ Y$, and $\xi \in H^{n + 1}_\tau (Y, \mathcal{F})$ is such that there exists a $\tau '$-covering $\{ X_ i \to X\} _{i \in I}$ such that $\xi $ restricts to zero on $X_ i$ for all $i \in I$. Problem: show that $\xi $ restricts to zero on a $\tau '$-covering of $Y$.

By Lemma 21.29.5 there exists a unique $\tau '$-cohomology class $\theta \in H^{n + 1}_{\tau '}(X, \epsilon _{X, *}\mathcal{F})$ whose image is $\xi |_ X$. Since $\xi |_ X$ pulls back to the same class on $X \times _ Y X$ via the two projections, we find that the same is true for $\theta $ (by uniqueness). By Lemma 21.29.6 we see that after replacing $Y$ by the members of a $\tau '$-covering, we may assume that $\theta = 0$. Consequently, we may assume that $\xi |_ X$ is zero.

Let $f : X \to Y$ be an element of $\mathcal{P}$ such that $\{ X \to Y\} $ is a $\tau $-covering, $\mathcal{F}$ is an object of $\mathcal{A}_ Y$, and $\xi \in H^{n + 1}_\tau (Y, \mathcal{F})$ maps to zero in $H^{n + 1}_\tau (X, \mathcal{F})$. Problem: show that $\xi $ restricts to zero on a $\tau '$-covering of $Y$.

The assumptions tell us $\xi $ maps to zero under the map

\[ \mathcal{F} \longrightarrow Rf_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F} \]

Use Lemma 21.20.5. A simple argument using the distinguished triangle of truncations (Derived Categories, Remark 13.12.4) shows that $\xi $ maps to zero under the map

\[ \mathcal{F} \longrightarrow \tau _{\leq n}Rf_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F} \]

We will compare this with the map $\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F} \to K$ where

\[ K = \tau _{\leq n}Rf_{\tau ', *}f_{\tau '}^{-1}\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F} = \tau _{\leq n}Rf_{\tau ', *}\epsilon _{X, *}f_{\tau }^{-1}\mathcal{F} \]

The equality $\epsilon _{X, *} f_\tau ^{-1} = f_{\tau '}^{-1} \epsilon _{Y, *}$ is a property of (21.29.0.1). Consider the map

\[ Rf_{\tau ', *}\epsilon _{X, *}f_{\tau }^{-1}\mathcal{F} \longrightarrow Rf_{\tau ', *}R\epsilon _{X, *}f_{\tau }^{-1}\mathcal{F} = R\epsilon _{Y, *}Rf_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F} \]

used in the proof of Lemma 21.29.3 which induces by adjunction a map

\[ \epsilon _ Y^{-1} Rf_{\tau ', *}\epsilon _{X, *}f_{\tau }^{-1}\mathcal{F} \to Rf_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F} \]

Taking trunctions we find a map

\[ \epsilon _ Y^{-1}K \longrightarrow \tau _{\leq n}Rf_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F} \]

which is an isomorphism by Lemma 21.29.3; the lemma applies because $f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ is in $\mathcal{A}_ X$ by Lemma 21.29.2. Choose a distinguished triangle

\[ \epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F} \to K \to L \to \epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F}[1] \]

The map $\mathcal{F} \to f_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ is injective as $\{ X \to Y\} $ is a $\tau $-covering. Thus $\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F} \to \epsilon _{Y, *}f_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F} = f_{\tau ', *}f_{\tau '}^{-1}\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F}$ is injective too. Hence $L$ only has nonzero cohomology sheaves in degrees $0, \ldots , n$. As $f_{\tau ', *}f_{\tau '}^{-1}\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F}$ is in $\mathcal{A}'_ Y$ by (2) and (4) we conclude that

\[ H^0(L) = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F} \to f_{\tau ', *}f_{\tau '}^{-1}\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F}) \]

is in the weak Serre subcategory $\mathcal{A}'_ Y$. For $1 \leq i \leq n$ we see that $H^ i(L) = R^ if_{\tau ', *}f_{\tau '}^{-1}\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F}$ is in $\mathcal{A}'_ Y$ by (2) and (4). Pulling back the distinguished triangle above by $\epsilon _ Y$ we get the distinguished triangle

\[ \mathcal{F} \to \tau _{\leq n}Rf_{\tau , *}f_\tau ^{-1}\mathcal{F} \to \epsilon _ Y^{-1}L \to \mathcal{F}[1] \]

Since $\xi $ maps to zero in the middle term we find that $\xi $ is the image of an element $\xi ' \in H^ n_\tau (Y, \epsilon _ Y^{-1}L)$. By Lemma 21.29.4 we have

\[ H^ n_{\tau '}(Y, L) = H^ n_\tau (Y, \epsilon _ Y^{-1}L), \]

Thus we may lift $\xi '$ to an element of $H^ n_{\tau '}(Y, L)$ and take the boundary into $H^{n + 1}_{\tau '}(Y, \epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F})$ to see that $\xi $ is in the image of the canonical map $H^{n + 1}_{\tau '}(Y, \epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F}) \to H^{n + 1}_\tau (Y, \mathcal{F})$. By locality of cohomology for $H^{n + 1}_{\tau '}(Y,\epsilon _{Y, *}\mathcal{F})$, see Lemma 21.7.3, we conclude. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0EZE. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.