Lemma 37.66.2. For a morphism of schemes f : X \to Y, the following are equivalent:
f is ind-quasi-affine,
for every affine open subscheme V \subset Y and every quasi-compact open subscheme U \subset f^{-1}(V), the induced morphism U \to V is quasi-affine.
for some cover \{ V_ j \} _{j \in J} of Y by quasi-compact and quasi-separated open subschemes V_ j \subset Y, every j \in J, and every quasi-compact open subscheme U \subset f^{-1}(V_ j), the induced morphism U \to V_ j is quasi-affine.
for every quasi-compact and quasi-separated open subscheme V \subset Y and every quasi-compact open subscheme U \subset f^{-1}(V), the induced morphism U \to V is quasi-affine.
In particular, the property of being an ind-quasi-affine morphism is Zariski local on the base.
Proof.
The equivalence (1) \Leftrightarrow (2) follows from the definitions and Morphisms, Lemma 29.13.3. For (2) \Rightarrow (4), let U and V be as in (4). By Schemes, Lemma 26.21.14, the induced morphism U \to V is quasi-compact. Thus, for every affine open V' \subset V, the fiber product V' \times _ V U is quasi-compact, so, by (2), the induced map V' \times _ V U \to V' is quasi-affine. Thus, U \to V is also quasi-affine by Morphisms, Lemma 29.13.3. This argument also gives (3) \Rightarrow (4): indeed, keeping the same notation, those affine opens V' \subset V that lie in one of the V_ j cover V, so one needs to argue that the quasi-compact map V' \times _ V U \to V' is quasi-affine. However, by (3), the composition V' \times _ V U \to V' \to V_ j is quasi-affine and, by Schemes, Lemma 26.21.13, the map V' \to V_ j is quasi-separated. Thus, V' \times _ V U \to V' is quasi-affine by Morphisms, Lemma 29.13.8. The final implications (4) \Rightarrow (2) and (4) \Rightarrow (3) are evident.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: