Lemma 28.29.7. Let $X$ be a quasi-affine scheme. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Let $E \subset W \subset X$ with $E$ finite and $W$ open. Then there exists an $s \in \Gamma (X, \mathcal{L})$ such that $X_ s$ is affine and $E \subset X_ s \subset W$.

**Proof.**
The proof of this lemma has a lot in common with the proof of Algebra, Lemma 10.15.2. Say $E = \{ x_1, \ldots , x_ n\} $. If $E = W = \emptyset $, then $s = 0$ works. If $W \not= \emptyset $, then we may assume $E \not= \emptyset $ by adding a point if necessary. Thus we may assume $n \geq 1$. We will prove the lemma by induction on $n$.

Base case: $n = 1$. After replacing $W$ by an affine open neighbourhood of $x_1$ in $W$, we may assume $W$ is affine. Combining Lemmas 28.27.1 and Proposition 28.26.13 we see that every quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module is globally generated. Hence there exists a global section $s$ of $\mathcal{L}$ which does not vanish at $x_1$. On the other hand, let $Z \subset X$ be the reduced induced closed subscheme on $X \setminus W$. Applying global generation to the quasi-coherent ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}$ of $Z$ we find a global section $f$ of $\mathcal{I}$ which does not vanish at $x_1$. Then $s' = fs$ is a global section of $\mathcal{L}$ which does not vanish at $x_1$ such that $X_{s'} \subset W$. Then $X_{s'}$ is affine by Lemma 28.26.4.

Induction step for $n > 1$. If there is a specialization $x_ i \leadsto x_ j$ for $i \not= j$, then it suffices to prove the lemma for $\{ x_1, \ldots , x_ n\} \setminus \{ x_ i\} $ and we are done by induction. Thus we may assume there are no specializations among the $x_ i$. By either Lemma 28.29.5 or Lemma 28.29.6 we may assume $W$ is affine. By induction we can find a global section $s$ of $\mathcal{L}$ such that $X_ s \subset W$ is affine and contains $x_1, \ldots , x_{n - 1}$. If $x_ n \in X_ s$ then we are done. Assume $s$ is zero at $x_ n$. By the case $n = 1$ we can find a global section $s'$ of $\mathcal{L}$ with $\{ x_ n\} \subset X_{s'} \subset W \setminus \overline{\{ x_1, \ldots , x_{n - 1}\} }$. Here we use that $x_ n$ is not a specialization of $x_1, \ldots , x_{n - 1}$. Then $s + s'$ is a global section of $\mathcal{L}$ which is nonvanishing at $x_1, \ldots , x_ n$ with $X_{s + s'} \subset W$ and we conclude as before. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)