Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 38.33.2. Let X be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let U \subset X be a quasi-compact open.

  1. If Z_1, Z_2 \subset X are closed subschemes of finite presentation such that Z_1 \cap Z_2 \cap U = \emptyset , then there exists a U-admissible blowing up X' \to X such that the strict transforms of Z_1 and Z_2 are disjoint.

  2. If T_1, T_2 \subset U are disjoint constructible closed subsets, then there is a U-admissible blowing up X' \to X such that the closures of T_1 and T_2 are disjoint.

Proof. Proof of (1). The assumption that Z_ i \to X is of finite presentation signifies that the quasi-coherent ideal sheaf \mathcal{I}_ i of Z_ i is of finite type, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.21.7. Denote Z \subset X the closed subscheme cut out by the product \mathcal{I}_1 \mathcal{I}_2. Observe that Z \cap U is the disjoint union of Z_1 \cap U and Z_2 \cap U. By Divisors, Lemma 31.34.5 there is a U \cap Z-admissible blowup Z' \to Z such that the strict transforms of Z_1 and Z_2 are disjoint. Denote Y \subset Z the center of this blowing up. Then Y \to X is a closed immersion of finite presentation as the composition of Y \to Z and Z \to X (Divisors, Definition 31.34.1 and Morphisms, Lemma 29.21.3). Thus the blowing up X' \to X of Y is a U-admissible blowing up. By general properties of strict transforms, the strict transform of Z_1, Z_2 with respect to X' \to X is the same as the strict transform of Z_1, Z_2 with respect to Z' \to Z, see Divisors, Lemma 31.33.2. Thus (1) is proved.

Proof of (2). By Properties, Lemma 28.24.1 there exists a finite type quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals \mathcal{J}_ i \subset \mathcal{O}_ U such that T_ i = V(\mathcal{J}_ i) (set theoretically). By Properties, Lemma 28.22.2 there exists a finite type quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals \mathcal{I}_ i \subset \mathcal{O}_ X whose restriction to U is \mathcal{J}_ i. Apply the result of part (1) to the closed subschemes Z_ i = V(\mathcal{I}_ i) to conclude. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 38.33: Nagata compactification

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.