Proof.
Proof of (1). The assumption that Z_ i \to X is of finite presentation signifies that the quasi-coherent ideal sheaf \mathcal{I}_ i of Z_ i is of finite type, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.21.7. Denote Z \subset X the closed subscheme cut out by the product \mathcal{I}_1 \mathcal{I}_2. Observe that Z \cap U is the disjoint union of Z_1 \cap U and Z_2 \cap U. By Divisors, Lemma 31.34.5 there is a U \cap Z-admissible blowup Z' \to Z such that the strict transforms of Z_1 and Z_2 are disjoint. Denote Y \subset Z the center of this blowing up. Then Y \to X is a closed immersion of finite presentation as the composition of Y \to Z and Z \to X (Divisors, Definition 31.34.1 and Morphisms, Lemma 29.21.3). Thus the blowing up X' \to X of Y is a U-admissible blowing up. By general properties of strict transforms, the strict transform of Z_1, Z_2 with respect to X' \to X is the same as the strict transform of Z_1, Z_2 with respect to Z' \to Z, see Divisors, Lemma 31.33.2. Thus (1) is proved.
Proof of (2). By Properties, Lemma 28.24.1 there exists a finite type quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals \mathcal{J}_ i \subset \mathcal{O}_ U such that T_ i = V(\mathcal{J}_ i) (set theoretically). By Properties, Lemma 28.22.2 there exists a finite type quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals \mathcal{I}_ i \subset \mathcal{O}_ X whose restriction to U is \mathcal{J}_ i. Apply the result of part (1) to the closed subschemes Z_ i = V(\mathcal{I}_ i) to conclude.
\square
Comments (0)
There are also: