Lemma 61.16.3. Let S be a scheme. Consider the morphism
\pi _ S : (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}\longrightarrow S_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}
of Lemma 61.12.13. Let \mathcal{F} be a sheaf on S_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}. Then \pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F} is given by the rule
(\pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F})(T) = \Gamma (T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}, f_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{F})
where f : T \to S. Moreover, \pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F} satisfies the sheaf condition with respect to fpqc coverings.
Proof.
Observe that we have a morphism i_ f : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}) such that \pi _ S \circ i_ f = f_{small} as morphisms T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}\to S_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}, see Lemma 61.12.12. Since pullback is transitive we see that i_ f^{-1} \pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F} = f_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{F} as desired.
Let \{ g_ i : T_ i \to T\} _{i \in I} be an fpqc covering. The final statement means the following: Given a sheaf \mathcal{G} on T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} and given sections s_ i \in \Gamma (T_ i, g_{i, small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}) whose pullbacks to T_ i \times _ T T_ j agree, there is a unique section s of \mathcal{G} over T whose pullback to T_ i agrees with s_ i. We will prove this statement when T is affine and the covering is given by a single surjective flat morphism T' \to T of affines and omit the reduction of the general case to this case.
Let g : T' \to T be a surjective flat morphism of affines and let s' \in g_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}(T') be a section with \text{pr}_0^*s' = \text{pr}_1^*s' on T' \times _ T T'. Choose a surjective weakly étale morphism W \to T' with W affine and weakly contractible, see Lemma 61.13.5. By Lemma 61.16.2 the restriction s'|_ W is an element of \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{W \to U} \mathcal{G}(U). Choose \phi : W \to U_0 and s_0 \in \mathcal{G}(U_0) corresponding to s'. Choose a surjective weakly étale morphism V \to W \times _ T W with V affine and weakly contractible. Denote a, b : V \to W the induced morphisms. Since a^*(s'|_ W) = b^*(s'|_ W) and since the category \{ V \to U, U \in T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}\} is cofiltered (this is clear but see Sites, Lemma 7.14.6 if in doubt), we see that the two morphisms \phi \circ a , \phi \circ b : V \to U_0 have to be equal. By the results in Descent, Section 35.13 (especially Descent, Lemma 35.13.7) it follows there is a unique morphism T \to U_0 such that \phi is the composition of this morphism with the structure morphism W \to T (small detail omitted). Then we can let s be the pullback of s_0 by this morphism. We omit the verification that s pulls back to s' on T'.
\square
Comments (0)