Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 61.16.3. Let S be a scheme. Consider the morphism

\pi _ S : (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}\longrightarrow S_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}

of Lemma 61.12.13. Let \mathcal{F} be a sheaf on S_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}. Then \pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F} is given by the rule

(\pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F})(T) = \Gamma (T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}, f_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{F})

where f : T \to S. Moreover, \pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F} satisfies the sheaf condition with respect to fpqc coverings.

Proof. Observe that we have a morphism i_ f : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}) such that \pi _ S \circ i_ f = f_{small} as morphisms T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}\to S_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}, see Lemma 61.12.12. Since pullback is transitive we see that i_ f^{-1} \pi _ S^{-1}\mathcal{F} = f_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{F} as desired.

Let \{ g_ i : T_ i \to T\} _{i \in I} be an fpqc covering. The final statement means the following: Given a sheaf \mathcal{G} on T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale} and given sections s_ i \in \Gamma (T_ i, g_{i, small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}) whose pullbacks to T_ i \times _ T T_ j agree, there is a unique section s of \mathcal{G} over T whose pullback to T_ i agrees with s_ i. We will prove this statement when T is affine and the covering is given by a single surjective flat morphism T' \to T of affines and omit the reduction of the general case to this case.

Let g : T' \to T be a surjective flat morphism of affines and let s' \in g_{small}^{-1}\mathcal{G}(T') be a section with \text{pr}_0^*s' = \text{pr}_1^*s' on T' \times _ T T'. Choose a surjective weakly étale morphism W \to T' with W affine and weakly contractible, see Lemma 61.13.5. By Lemma 61.16.2 the restriction s'|_ W is an element of \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{W \to U} \mathcal{G}(U). Choose \phi : W \to U_0 and s_0 \in \mathcal{G}(U_0) corresponding to s'. Choose a surjective weakly étale morphism V \to W \times _ T W with V affine and weakly contractible. Denote a, b : V \to W the induced morphisms. Since a^*(s'|_ W) = b^*(s'|_ W) and since the category \{ V \to U, U \in T_{pro\text{-}\acute{e}tale}\} is cofiltered (this is clear but see Sites, Lemma 7.14.6 if in doubt), we see that the two morphisms \phi \circ a , \phi \circ b : V \to U_0 have to be equal. By the results in Descent, Section 35.13 (especially Descent, Lemma 35.13.7) it follows there is a unique morphism T \to U_0 such that \phi is the composition of this morphism with the structure morphism W \to T (small detail omitted). Then we can let s be the pullback of s_0 by this morphism. We omit the verification that s pulls back to s' on T'. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.