Lemma 36.37.1. Let X be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme with the resolution property. Let \mathcal{F}^\bullet be a bounded below complex of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules representing a perfect object of D(\mathcal{O}_ X). Then there exists a bounded complex \mathcal{E}^\bullet of finite locally free \mathcal{O}_ X-modules and a quasi-isomorphism \mathcal{E}^\bullet \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet .
Proof. Let a, b \in \mathbf{Z} be integers such that \mathcal{F}^\bullet has tor amplitude in [a, b] and such that \mathcal{F}^ n = 0 for n < a. The existence of such a pair of integers follows from Cohomology, Lemma 20.49.5 and the fact that X is quasi-compact. If b < a, then \mathcal{F}^\bullet is zero in the derived category and the lemma holds. We will prove by induction on b - a \geq 0 that there exists a complex \mathcal{E}^ a \to \ldots \to \mathcal{E}^ b with \mathcal{E}^ i finite locally free and a quasi-isomorphism \mathcal{E}^\bullet \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet .
The base case is the case b - a = 0. In this case H^ b(\mathcal{F}^\bullet ) = H^ a(\mathcal{F}^\bullet ) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{F}^ a \to \mathcal{F}^{a + 1}) is finite locally free. Namely, it is a finitely presented \mathcal{O}_ X-module of tor dimension 0 and hence finite locally free. See Cohomology, Lemmas 20.49.5 and 20.47.9 and Properties, Lemma 28.20.2. Thus we can take \mathcal{E}^\bullet to be H^ b(\mathcal{F}^\bullet ) sitting in degree b. The rest of the proof is dedicated to the induction step.
Assume b > a. Observe that
is a finite type quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module, see Cohomology, Lemmas 20.49.5 and 20.47.9. Then we can find a finite type quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{F} and a map
such that the composition with the projection onto H^ b(\mathcal{F}^\bullet ) is surjective. Namely, we can write \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{F}^ b \to \mathcal{F}^{b + 1}) as the filtered union of its finite type quasi-coherent submodules by Properties, Lemma 28.22.3 and then one of these will do the job. Next, we choose a finite locally free \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{E}^ b and a surjection \mathcal{E}^ b \to \mathcal{F} using the resolution property of X. Consider the map of complexes
and its cone C(\alpha )^\bullet , see Derived Categories, Definition 13.9.1. We observe that C(\alpha )^\bullet is nonzero only in degrees \geq a, has tor amplitude in [a, b] by Cohomology, Lemma 20.48.6, and has H^ b(C(\alpha )^\bullet ) = 0 by construction. Thus we actually find that C(\alpha )^\bullet has tor amplitude in [a, b - 1]. Hence the induction hypothesis applies to C(\alpha )^\bullet and we find a map of complexes
with properties as stated in the induction hypothesis. Unwinding the definition of the cone this gives a commutative diagram
It is clear that we obtain a map of complexes (\mathcal{E}^ a \to \ldots \to \mathcal{E}^ b) \to \mathcal{F}^\bullet . We omit the verification that this map is a quasi-isomorphism. \square
Comments (2)
Comment #7259 by Torsten Wedhorn on
Comment #7331 by Johan on