Lemma 24.24.1. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a sheaf of differential graded algebras on $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$. The forgetful functor $F : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d}) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A})$ has a left adjoint $G : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$.

## 24.24 The differential graded hull of a graded module

The differential graded hull of a graded module $\mathcal{N}$ is the result of applying the functor $G$ in the following lemma.

**Proof.**
To prove the existence of $G$ we can use the adjoint functor theorem, see Categories, Theorem 4.25.3 (observe that we have switched the roles of $F$ and $G$). The exactness conditions on $F$ are satisfied by Lemma 24.13.2. The set theoretic condition can be seen as follows: suppose given a graded $\mathcal{A}$-module $\mathcal{N}$. Then for any map

we can consider the smallest differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-submodule $\mathcal{M}' \subset \mathcal{M}$ with $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\varphi ) \subset F(\mathcal{M}')$. It is clear that $\mathcal{M}'$ is the image of the map of graded $\mathcal{A}$-modules

defined by

because the image of this map is easily seen to be a differential graded submodule of $\mathcal{M}$. Thus the number of possible isomorphism classes of these $\mathcal{M}'$ is bounded and we conclude. $\square$

Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a sheaf of differential graded algebras on $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$. Let $\mathcal{M}$ be a differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-module and suppose we have a short exact sequence

in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A})$. Then we obtain a canonical graded $\mathcal{A}$-module homomorphism

as follows: given a local section $x$ of $\mathcal{N}$ denote $\overline{\text{d}}(x)$ the image in $\mathcal{N}'$ of $\text{d}_\mathcal {M}(x)$ when $x$ is viewed as a local section of $\mathcal{M}$.

Lemma 24.24.2. The functors $F, G$ of Lemma 24.24.1 have the following properties. Given a graded $\mathcal{A}$-module $\mathcal{N}$ we have

the counit $\mathcal{N} \to F(G(\mathcal{N}))$ is injective,

the map $\overline{\text{d}} : \mathcal{N} \to \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\mathcal{N} \to F(G(\mathcal{N})))[1]$ is an isomorphism, and

$G(\mathcal{N})$ is an acyclic differential graded $\mathcal{A}$-module.

**Proof.**
We observe that property (3) is a consequence of properties (1) and (2). Namely, if $s$ is a nonzero local section of $F(G(\mathcal{N}))$ with $\text{d}(s) = 0$, then $s$ cannot be in the image of $\mathcal{N} \to F(G(\mathcal{N}))$. Hence we can write the image $\overline{s}$ of $s$ in the cokernel as $\overline{\text{d}}(s')$ for some local section $s'$ of $\mathcal{N}$. Then we see that $s = \text{d}(s')$ because the difference $s - \text{d}(s')$ is still in the kernel of $\text{d}$ and is contained in the image of the counit.

Let us write temporarily $\mathcal{A}_{gr}$, respectively $\mathcal{A}_{dg}$ the sheaf $\mathcal{A}$ viewed as a (right) graded module over itself, respectively as a (right) differential graded module over itself. The most important case of the lemma is to understand what is $G(\mathcal{A}_{gr})$. Of course $G(\mathcal{A}_{gr})$ is the object of $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ representing the functor

By Remark 24.22.5 we see that this functor represented by $C[-1]$ where $C$ is the cone on the identity of $\mathcal{A}_{dg}$. We have a short exact sequence

in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}, \text{d})$ which is split by the counit $\mathcal{A}_{gr} \to F(C[-1])$ in $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A})$. Thus $G(\mathcal{A}_{gr})$ satisfies properties (1) and (2).

Let $U$ be an object of $\mathcal{C}$. Denote $j_ U : \mathcal{C}/U \to \mathcal{C}$ the localization morphism. Denote $\mathcal{A}_ U$ the restriction of $\mathcal{A}$ to $U$. We will use the notation $\mathcal{A}_{U, gr}$ to denote $\mathcal{A}_ U$ viewed as a graded $\mathcal{A}_ U$-module. Denote $F_ U : \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}_ U, \text{d}) \to \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}_ U)$ the forgetful functor and denote $G_ U$ its adjoint. Then we have the commutative diagrams

by the construction of $j^*_ U$ and $j_{U!}$ in Sections 24.9, 24.18, 24.10, and 24.19. By uniqueness of adjoints we obtain $j_{U!} \circ G_ U = G \circ j_{U!}$. Since $j_{U!}$ is an exact functor, we see that the properties (1) and (2) for the counit $\mathcal{A}_{U, gr} \to F_ U(G_ U(\mathcal{A}_{U, gr}))$ which we've seen in the previous part of the proof imply properties (1) and (2) for the counit $j_{U!}\mathcal{A}_{U, gr} \to F(G(j_{U!}\mathcal{A}_{U, gr})) = j_{U!}F_ U(G_ U(\mathcal{A}_{U, gr}))$.

In the proof of Lemma 24.11.1 we have seen that any object of $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A})$ is a quotient of a direct sum of copies of $j_{U!}\mathcal{A}_{U, gr}$. Since $G$ is a left adjoint, we see that $G$ commutes with direct sums. Thus properties (1) and (2) hold for direct sums of objects for which they hold. Thus we see that every object $\mathcal{N}$ of $\textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A})$ fits into an exact sequence

such that (1) and (2) hold for $\mathcal{N}_1$ and $\mathcal{N}_0$. We leave it to the reader to deduce (1) and (2) for $\mathcal{N}$ using that $G$ is right exact. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)