Proposition 56.13.4. Let $F$ and $F'$ be siblings as in Definition 56.13.1. Assume that $F$ is fully faithful and that $\mathcal{A}$ has enough negative objects (see above). Then $F$ and $F'$ are isomorphic functors.

[Proposition 2.16, Orlov-K3]

**Proof.**
By part (2) of Definition 56.13.1 the image of the functor $F'$ is contained in the essential image of the functor $F$. Hence the functor $H = F^{-1} \circ F'$ is a sibling of the identity functor. This reduces us to the case described in the next paragraph.

Let $\mathcal{D} = D^ b(\mathcal{A})$. We have to show a sibling $F : \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{D}$ of the identity functor is isomorphic to the identity functor. Given an object $X$ of $\mathcal{D}$ let us say $X$ has *width* $w = w(X)$ if $w \geq 0$ is minimal such that there exists an integer $a \in \mathbf{Z}$ with $H^ i(X) = 0$ for $i \not\in [a, a + w - 1]$. Since $F$ is a sibling of the identity and since $F \circ [n] = [n] \circ F$ we are aready given isomorphisms

for $w(X) \leq 1$ compatible with shifts. Moreover, if $X = A[-a]$ and $X' = A'[-a]$ for some $A, A' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ then for any morphism $f : X \to X'$ the diagram

is commutative.

Next, let us show that for any morphism $f : X \to X'$ with $w(X), w(X') \leq 1$ the diagram (56.13.4.1) commutes. If $X$ or $X'$ is zero, this is clear. If not then we can write $X = A[-a]$ and $X' = A'[-a']$ for unique $A, A'$ in $\mathcal{A}$ and $a, a' \in \mathbf{Z}$. The case $a = a'$ was discussed above. If $a' > a$, then $f = 0$ (Derived Categories, Lemma 13.27.3) and the result is clear. If $a' < a$ then $f$ corresponds to an element $\xi \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ q(A, A')$ with $q = a - a'$. Using Yoneda extensions, see Derived Categories, Section 13.27, we can find $A = A_0, A_1, \ldots , A_{q - 1}, A_ q = A' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{A})$ and elements

such that $\xi $ is the composition $\xi _ q \circ \ldots \circ \xi _1$. In other words, setting $X_ i = A_ i[-a + i]$ we obtain morphisms

whose compostion is $f$. Since the commutativity of (56.13.4.1) for $f_1, \ldots , f_ q$ implies it for $f$, this reduces us to the case $q = 1$. In this case after shifting we may assume we have a distinguished triangle

Observe that $E$ is an object of $\mathcal{A}$. Consider the following diagram

whose rows are distinguished triangles. The square on the right commutes already but we don't yet know that the middle square does. By the axioms of a triangulated category we can find a morphism $\delta $ which does make the diagram commute. Then $\gamma - c_{A'}[1]$ composed with $F(A')[1] \to F(E)[1]$ is zero hence we can find $\epsilon : A'[1] \to F(A)$ such that $\gamma - c_{A'}[1] = F(f) \circ \epsilon $. However, any arrow $A'[1] \to F(A)$ is zero as it is a negative ext class between objects of $\mathcal{A}$. Hence $\gamma = c_{A'}[1]$ and we conclude the middle square commutes too which is what we wanted to show.

To finish the proof we are going to argue by induction on $w$ that there exist isomorphisms $c_ X : X \to F(X)$ for all $X$ with $w(X) \leq w$ compatible with all morphisms between such objects. The base case $w = 1$ was shown above. Assume we know the result for some $w \geq 1$.

Let $X$ be an object with $w(X) = w + 1$. Pick $a \in \mathbf{Z}$ with $H^ i(X) = 0$ for $i \not\in [a, a + w]$. Set $b = a + w$ so that $H^ b(X)$ is nonzero. Pick $N$ in $\mathcal{A}$ such that there exists a surjection $N \to H^ b(X)$, such that $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (H^ b(X), N) = 0$ and such that $\mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ q(N, H^ i(X)) = 0$ for $i \in \mathbf{Z}$ and $q > 0$. This is possible because $\mathcal{A}$ has enough negative objects by appplying the definition to $\bigoplus H^ i(X)$. By the vanishing of Exts we can lift the surjection $N \to H^ b(X)$ to a morphism $N[-b] \to X$; details omitted. Let us call a morphism $N[-b] \to X$ constructed in this manner a *good morphism*. Given a good morphism $N[-b] \to X$ choose a distinguished diagram

Computing the long exact cohomology sequence we find $w(Y) \leq w$. Hence by induction we find the solid arrows in the following diagram

We obtain the dotted arrow $c_{N[-b] \to X}$. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.4.8 the dotted arrow is unique because $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X, F(N)[-b]) \cong \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X, N[-b]) = 0$ by our choice of $N$. In fact, $c_{N[-b] \to X}$ is the unique dotted arrow making the square with vertices $X, Y, F(X), F(Y)$ commute. Our goal is to show that $c_{N[-b] \to X}$ is independent of the choice of good morphism $N[-b] \to X$ and that the diagrams (56.13.4.1) commute.

Independence of the choice of good morphism. Given two good morphisms $N[-b] \to X$ and $N'[-b] \to X$ we get another good morphism, namely $(N \oplus N')[-b] \to X$. Thus we may assume $N'[-b] \to X$ factors as $N'[-b] \to N[-b] \to X$ for some morphism $N' \to N$. Choose distinguished triangles $N[-b] \to X \to Y \to N[-b + 1]$ and $N'[-b] \to X \to Y' \to N'[-b + 1]$. By axiom TR3 we can find a morphism $g : Y' \to Y$ which joint with $\text{id}_ X$ and $N' \to N$ forms a morphism of triangles. Since we have (56.13.4.1) for $g$ we conclude that

The uniqueness of $c_{N[-b] \to X}$ pointed out in the construction above now shows that $c_{N'[-b] \to X} = c_{N[-b] \to X}$.

Let $f : X \to X'$ be a morphism of objects with $w(X) \leq w + 1$ and $w(X') \leq w + 1$. Choose $a \leq b \leq a + w$ such that $H^ i(X) = 0$ for $i \not\in [a, b]$ and $a' \leq b' \leq a' + w$ such that $H^ i(X') = 0$ for $i \not\in [a', b']$. We will use induction on $(b' - a') + (b - a)$ to show this. (The base case is when this number is zero which is OK because $w \geq 1$.) We distinguish two cases.

Case I: $b' < b$. In this case we choose a good morphism $N[-b] \to X$ such that in addition $\mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^ q(N, H^ i(X')) = 0$ for $q > 0$ and all $i$. Choose a distuiguished triangle $N[-b] \to X \to Y \to N[-b + 1]$. Since $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (N[-b], X') = 0$ by our choice of $N$ and we find that $f$ factors as $X \to Y \to X'$. Since $H^ i(Y)$ is nonzero only for $i \in [a, b - 1]$ we see by induction that (56.13.4.1) commutes for $Y \to X'$. The diagram (56.13.4.1) commutes for $X \to Y$ by construction if $w(X) = w + 1$ and by our first induction hypothesis if $w(X) \leq w$. Hence (56.13.4.1) commutes for $f$.

Case II: $b' \geq b$. In this case we choose a good morphism $N'[-b'] \to X'$ such that $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (H^{b'}(X), N') = 0$ (this is relevant only if $b' = b$). We choose a distinguished triangle $N'[-b'] \to X' \to Y' \to N'[-b' + 1]$. Since $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X, X') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X, Y')$ is injective by our choice of $N'$ (details omitted) the same is true for $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X, F(X')) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (X, F(Y'))$. Hence it suffices in this case to check that (56.13.4.1) commutes for the composition $X \to Y'$ of the morphisms $X \to X' \to Y'$. Since $H^ i(Y')$ is nonzero only for $i \in [a', b' - 1]$ we conclude by induction hypothesis. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)