Lemma 15.101.5. In Situation 15.91.15 assume A is Noetherian. With notation as above, the inverse system (I^ n) is pro-isomorphic in D(A) to the inverse system (I_ n^\bullet ).
Proof. It is elementary to show that the inverse system I^ n is pro-isomorphic to the inverse system (f_1^ n, \ldots , f_ r^ n) in the category of A-modules. Consider the inverse system of distinguished triangles
where C_ n^\bullet is the cone of the first arrow. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.42.4 it suffices to show that the inverse system C_ n^\bullet is pro-zero. The complex I_ n^\bullet has nonzero terms only in degrees i with -r + 1 \leq i \leq 0 hence C_ n^\bullet is bounded similarly. Thus by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.42.3 it suffices to show that H^ p(C_ n^\bullet ) is pro-zero. By the discussion above we have H^ p(C_ n^\bullet ) = H^ p(K_ n^\bullet ) for p \leq -1 and H^ p(C_ n^\bullet ) = 0 for p \geq 0. The fact that the inverse systems H^ p(K_ n^\bullet ) are pro-zero was shown in the proof of Lemma 15.94.1 (and this is where the assumption that A is Noetherian is used). \square
Comments (0)
There are also: