Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 15.101.5. In Situation 15.91.15 assume A is Noetherian. With notation as above, the inverse system (I^ n) is pro-isomorphic in D(A) to the inverse system (I_ n^\bullet ).

Proof. It is elementary to show that the inverse system I^ n is pro-isomorphic to the inverse system (f_1^ n, \ldots , f_ r^ n) in the category of A-modules. Consider the inverse system of distinguished triangles

I_ n^\bullet \to (f_1^ n, \ldots , f_ r^ n) \to C_ n^\bullet \to I_ n^\bullet [1]

where C_ n^\bullet is the cone of the first arrow. By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.42.4 it suffices to show that the inverse system C_ n^\bullet is pro-zero. The complex I_ n^\bullet has nonzero terms only in degrees i with -r + 1 \leq i \leq 0 hence C_ n^\bullet is bounded similarly. Thus by Derived Categories, Lemma 13.42.3 it suffices to show that H^ p(C_ n^\bullet ) is pro-zero. By the discussion above we have H^ p(C_ n^\bullet ) = H^ p(K_ n^\bullet ) for p \leq -1 and H^ p(C_ n^\bullet ) = 0 for p \geq 0. The fact that the inverse systems H^ p(K_ n^\bullet ) are pro-zero was shown in the proof of Lemma 15.94.1 (and this is where the assumption that A is Noetherian is used). \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 1 comment(s) on Section 15.101: Systems of modules, bis

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.