Lemma 15.101.6. Let A be a Noetherian ring. Let I \subset A be an ideal. Let M^\bullet be a bounded complex of finite A-modules. The inverse system of maps
defines an isomorphism of pro-objects of D(A).
Lemma 15.101.6. Let A be a Noetherian ring. Let I \subset A be an ideal. Let M^\bullet be a bounded complex of finite A-modules. The inverse system of maps
defines an isomorphism of pro-objects of D(A).
Proof. Choose generators f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in I of I. The inverse system I^ n is pro-isomorphic to the inverse system (f_1^ n, \ldots , f_ r^ n) in the category of A-modules. With notation as in Lemma 15.101.5 we find that it suffices to prove the inverse system of maps
defines an isomorphism of pro-objects of D(A). Say we have a \leq b such that M^ i = 0 if i \not\in [a, b]. Then source and target of the arrows above have cohomology only in degrees [-r + a, b]. Thus it suffices to show that for any p \in \mathbf{Z} the inverse system of maps
defines an isomorphism of pro-objects of A-modules, see Derived Categories, Lemma 13.42.5. Using the pro-isomorphism between I_ n^\bullet \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} M^\bullet and I^ n \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} M^\bullet and the pro-isomorphism between (f_1^ n, \ldots , f_ r^ n)M^\bullet and I^ nM^\bullet this is equivalent to showing that the inverse system of maps
defines an isomorphism of pro-objects of A-modules Choose a bounded above complex of finite free A-modules P^\bullet and a quasi-isomorphism P^\bullet \to M^\bullet . Then it suffices to show that the inverse system of maps
is a pro-isomorphism. This follows from Lemma 15.101.1 as H^ p(P^\bullet ) = H^ p(M^\bullet ). \square
Comments (0)
There are also: