Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

The Stacks project

Lemma 36.6.3. Let X be a scheme. Let T \subset X be a closed subset such that X \setminus T is a retrocompact open of X. Then for a family of objects E_ i, i \in I of D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) we have R\mathcal{H}_ T(\bigoplus E_ i) = \bigoplus R\mathcal{H}_ T(E_ i).

Proof. Set U = X \setminus T and denote j : U \to X the inclusion. By Cohomology, Lemma 20.34.6 there is a distinguished triangle

i_*R\mathcal{H}_ T(E) \to E \to Rj_*(E|_ U) \to i_*R\mathcal{H}_ Z(E)[1]

in D(\mathcal{O}_ X) for any E in D(\mathcal{O}_ X). The functor E \mapsto Rj_*(E|_ U) commutes with direct sums on D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) by Lemma 36.4.5. It follows that the same is true for the functor i_* \circ R\mathcal{H}_ T (details omitted). Since i_* : D(i^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ X) \to D_ T(\mathcal{O}_ X) is an equivalence (Cohomology, Lemma 20.34.2) we conclude. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 3 comment(s) on Section 36.6: Cohomology with support in a closed subset

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.