Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/Latin1Supplement.js

The Stacks project

Lemma 81.3.3. Let S be a scheme. Let B be an algebraic space over S. Let \mathcal{I} \to (\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}, i \mapsto X_ i be a diagram of algebraic spaces over B. Let (X, X_ i \to X) be a cocone for the diagram in the category of algebraic spaces over B (Categories, Remark 4.14.5). Assume that

  1. the base change functor X_{spaces, étale} \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_{i, spaces, {\acute{e}tale}}, sending U to U_ i = X_ i \times _ X U is an equivalence,

  2. given

    1. B' affine and étale over B,

    2. Z an affine scheme over B',

    3. U \to X \times _ B B' an étale morphism of algebraic spaces with U affine,

    4. f_ i : U_ i \to Z a cocone over B' of the diagram i \mapsto U_ i = U \times _ X X_ i,

    there exists a unique morphism f : U \to Z over B' such that f_ i equals the composition U_ i \to U \to Z.

Then X = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_ i in the category of all algebraic spaces over B.

Proof. In this paragraph we reduce to the case where B is an affine scheme. Let B' \to B be an étale morphism of algebraic spaces. Observe that conditions (1) and (2) are preserved if we replace B, X_ i, X by B', X_ i \times _ B B', X \times _ B B'. Let \{ B_ a \to B\} _{a \in A} be an étale covering with B_ a affine, see Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.6.1. For a \in A denote X_ a, X_{a, i} the base changes of X and the diagram to B_ a. For a, b \in A denote X_{a, b} and X_{a, b, i} the base changes of X and the diagram to B_ a \times _ B B_ b. By Lemma 81.3.2 it suffices to prove that X_ a = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_{a, i} and X_{a, b} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits X_{a, b, i}. This reduces us to the case where B = B_ a (an affine scheme) or B = B_ a \times _ B B_ b (a separated scheme). Repeating the argument once more, we conclude that we may assume B is an affine scheme (this uses that the intersection of affine opens in a separated scheme is affine).

Assume B is an affine scheme. Let Z be an algebraic space over B. We have to show

\mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ B(X, Z) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ B(X_ i, Z)

is a bijection.

Proof of injectivity. Let f, g : X \to Z be morphisms such that the compositions f_ i, g_ i : X_ i \to Z are the same for all i. Choose an affine scheme Z' and an étale morphism Z' \to Z. By Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.6.1 we know we can cover Z by such affines. Set U = X \times _{f, Z} Z' and U' = X \times _{g, Z} Z' and denote p : U \to X and p' : U' \to X the projections. Since f_ i = g_ i for all i, we see that

U_ i = X_ i \times _{f_ i, Z} Z' = X_ i \times _{g_ i, Z} Z' = U'_ i

compatible with transition morphisms. By (1) there is a unique isomorphism \epsilon : U \to U' as algebraic spaces over X, i.e., with p = p' \circ \epsilon which is compatible with the displayed identifications. Choose an étale covering \{ h_ a : U_ a \to U\} with U_ a affine. By (2) we see that f \circ p \circ h_ a = g \circ p' \circ \epsilon \circ h_ a = g \circ p \circ h_ a. Since \{ h_ a : U_ a \to U\} is an étale covering we conclude f \circ p = g \circ p. Since the collection of morphisms p : U \to X we obtain in this manner is an étale covering, we conclude that f = g.

Proof of surjectivity. Let f_ i : X_ i \to Z be an element of the right hand side of the displayed arrow in the first paragraph of the proof. It suffices to find an étale covering \{ U_ c \to X\} _{c \in C} such that the families f_{c, i} \in \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _ B(X_ i \times _ X U_ c, Z) come from morphisms f_ c : U_ c \to Z. Namely, by the uniqueness proved above the morphisms f_ c will agree on U_ c \times _ X U_ b and hence will descend to give the desired morphism f : X \to Z. To find our covering, we first choose an étale covering \{ g_ a : Z_ a \to Z\} _{a \in A} where each Z_ a is affine. Then we let U_{a, i} = X_ i \times _{f_ i, Z} Z_ a. By (1) we find U_{a, i} = X_ i \times _ X U_ a for some algebraic spaces U_ a étale over X. Then we choose étale coverings \{ U_{a, b} \to U_ a\} _{b \in B_ a} with U_{a, b} affine and we consider the morphisms

U_{a, b, i} = X_ i \times _ X U_{a, b} \to X_ i \times _ X U_ a = X_ i \times _{f_ i, Z} Z_ a \to Z_ a

By (2) we obtain morphisms f_{a, b} : U_{a, b} \to Z_ a compatible with these morphisms. Setting C = \coprod _{a \in A} B_ a and for c \in C corresponding to b \in B_ a setting U_ c = U_{a, b} and f_ c = g_ a \circ f_{a, b} : U_ c \to Z we conclude. \square


Comments (0)

There are also:

  • 2 comment(s) on Section 81.3: Colimits of algebraic spaces

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.