## 86.25 Surjective morphisms

By Lemma 86.12.4 the following definition does not clash with the already existing definitions for morphisms of algebraic spaces or morphisms of formal algebraic spaces which are representable by algebraic spaces.

Definition 86.25.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. A morphism $f : X \to Y$ of formal algebraic spaces over $S$ is said to be surjective if it induces a surjective morphism $X_{red} \to Y_{red}$ on underlying reduced algebraic spaces.

Lemma 86.25.2. The composition of two surjective morphisms is a surjective morphism.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

Lemma 86.25.3. A base change of a surjective morphism is a surjective morphism.

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

Lemma 86.25.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of formal algebraic spaces over $S$. The following are equivalent

1. $f$ is surjective,

2. for every scheme $T$ and morphism $T \to Y$ the projection $X \times _ Y T \to T$ is a surjective morphism of formal algebraic spaces,

3. for every affine scheme $T$ and morphism $T \to Y$ the projection $X \times _ Y T \to T$ is a surjective morphism of formal algebraic spaces,

4. there exists a covering $\{ Y_ j \to Y\}$ as in Definition 86.11.1 such that each $X \times _ Y Y_ j \to Y_ j$ is a surjective morphism of formal algebraic spaces,

5. there exists a surjective morphism $Z \to Y$ of formal algebraic spaces such that $X \times _ Y Z \to Z$ is surjective, and

Proof. Omitted. $\square$

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0GHN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.