Lemma 20.48.3. Let $h : X \to Y$ be a morphism of ringed spaces. Let $K, M$ be objects of $D(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$. The canonical map

$Lh^*R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (K, M) \to \longrightarrow R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (Lh^*K, Lh^*M)$

of Remark 20.39.13 is an isomorphism in the following cases

1. $K$ is perfect,

2. $h$ is flat, $K$ is pseudo-coherent, and $M$ is (locally) bounded below,

3. $\mathcal{O}_ X$ has finite tor dimension over $h^{-1}\mathcal{O}_ Y$, $K$ is pseudo-coherent, and $M$ is (locally) bounded below,

Proof. Proof of (1). The question is local on $Y$, hence we may assume that $K$ is represented by a strictly perfect complex $\mathcal{E}^\bullet$, see Section 20.46. Choose a K-flat complex $\mathcal{F}^\bullet$ representing $M$. Apply Lemma 20.43.9 to see that $R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (K, L)$ is represented by the complex $\mathcal{H}^\bullet = \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{E}^\bullet , \mathcal{F}^\bullet )$ with terms $\mathcal{H}^ n = \bigoplus \nolimits _{n = p + q} \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits _{\mathcal{O}_ X}(\mathcal{E}^{-q}, \mathcal{F}^ p)$. By the construction of $Lh^*$ in Section 20.27 we see that $Lh^*K$ is represented by the strictly perfect complex $h^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet$ (Lemma 20.43.4). Similarly, the object $Lh^*M$ is represented by the complex $h^*\mathcal{F}^\bullet$. Finally, the object $Lh^*R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (K, M)$ is represented by $h^*\mathcal{H}^\bullet$ as $\mathcal{H}^\bullet$ is K-flat by Lemma 20.43.10. Thus to finish the proof it suffices to show that $h^*\mathcal{H}^\bullet = \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (h^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet , h^*\mathcal{F}^\bullet )$. For this it suffices to note that $h^*\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (h^*\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{F})$ whenever $\mathcal{E}$ is a direct summand of a finite free $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module.

Proof of (2). Since $h$ is flat, we can compute $Lh^*$ by simply using $h^*$ on any complex of $\mathcal{O}_ Y$-modules. In particular we have $H^ i(Lh^*K) = h^*H^ i(K)$ for all $i \in \mathbf{Z}$. Say $H^ i(M) = 0$ for $i < a$. Let $K' \to K$ be a morphism of $D(\mathcal{O}_ Y)$ which defines an isomorphism $H^ i(K') \to H^ i(K)$ for all $i \geq b$. Then the corresponding maps

$R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (K, M) \to R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (K', M)$

and

$R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (Lh^*K, Lh^*M) \to R\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits (Lh^*K', Lh^*M)$

are isomorphisms on cohomology sheaves in degrees $< a - b$ (details omitted). Thus to prove the map in the statement of the lemma induces an isomorphism on cohomology sheaves in degrees $< a - b$ it suffices to prove the result for $K'$ in those degrees. Also, as in the proof of part (1) the question is local on $Y$. Thus we may assume $K$ is represented by a strictly perfect complex, see Section 20.44. This reduces us to case (1).

Proof of (3). The proof is the same as the proof of (2) except one uses that $Lh^*$ has bounded cohomological dimension to get the desired vanishing. We omit the details. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0GM7. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.