Lemma 103.15.3. With assumptions and notation as in Lemma 103.15.1 the canonical (base change) map

is an isomorphism for any abelian sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale}$ (resp. $\mathcal{X}_{fppf}$).

Lemma 103.15.3. With assumptions and notation as in Lemma 103.15.1 the canonical (base change) map

\[ g^{-1}Rf_*\mathcal{F} \longrightarrow Rf'_*(g')^{-1}\mathcal{F} \]

is an isomorphism for any abelian sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathcal{X}_{\acute{e}tale}$ (resp. $\mathcal{X}_{fppf}$).

**Proof.**
Comparing the formula for $g^{-1}R^ pf_*\mathcal{F}$ and $R^ pf'_*(g')^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ given in Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.21.2 and Lemma 103.15.2 we see that it suffices to show

\[ H^ p((V \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}} \mathcal{X})', \ \text{pr}^{-1}\mathcal{F}|_{(V \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}} \mathcal{X})'}) = H^ p_\tau (V \times _{y, \mathcal{Y}} \mathcal{X},\ \text{pr}^{-1}\mathcal{F}) \]

where $\tau = {\acute{e}tale}$ (resp. $\tau = fppf$). Here $y$ is an object of $\mathcal{Y}$ lying over a scheme $V$ such that the morphism $y : V \to \mathcal{Y}$ is smooth (resp. flat). This equality follows from Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.23.3. Although we omit the verification of the assumptions of the lemma, we note that the fact that $V \to \mathcal{Y}$ is smooth (resp. flat) is used to verify the second condition. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)