Lemma 21.43.7. In the situation above, there exists a cardinal \kappa with the following property: given a complex \mathcal{F}^\bullet of \mathcal{O}-modules representing an object K of D(\mathcal{O}) there exists a subcomplex \mathcal{H}^\bullet \subset \mathcal{F}^\bullet such that \mathcal{H}^\bullet represents K and such that |\mathcal{H}^\bullet | \leq \max (\kappa , |K|).
Proof. First, for every i and U we choose a subset \Omega ^ i_ U \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\text{d} : \mathcal{F}^ i(U) \to \mathcal{F}^{i + 1}(U)) mapping bijectively onto H^ i(K)(U) = H^ i(\mathcal{F}^\bullet (U)). Hence |\Omega ^ i_ U| \leq |K| as we may represent K by a complex whose size is |K|. Applying Lemma 21.43.6 we find a subcomplex \mathcal{S}^\bullet \subset \mathcal{F}^\bullet of size at most \max (\kappa , |K|) containing \Omega ^ i_ U and hence such that H^ i(\mathcal{S}^\bullet ) \to H^ i(\mathcal{F}^\bullet ) is a surjection of sheaves.
We are going to inductively construct subcomplexes
of size \leq \max (\kappa , |K|) such that the kernel of H^ i(\mathcal{S}_ n^\bullet ) \to H^ i(\mathcal{F}^\bullet ) is the same as the kernel of H^ i(\mathcal{S}_ n^\bullet ) \to H^ i(\mathcal{S}_{n + 1}^\bullet ). Once this is done we can take \mathcal{H}^\bullet = \bigcup \mathcal{S}_ n^\bullet as our solution.
Construction of \mathcal{S}_{n + 1}^\bullet given \mathcal{S}_ n^\bullet . For ever U and i let \Omega ^{i - 1}_ U \subset \mathcal{F}^{i - 1}(U) be a subset such that \text{d} : \mathcal{F}^{i - 1}(U) \to \mathcal{F}^ i(U) maps \Omega ^{i - 1}_ U bijectively onto
Observe that |\Omega ^ i_ U| \leq |K| because \mathcal{S}_ n^ i(U) is so bounded. Then we get \mathcal{S}_{n + 1}^\bullet by an application of Lemma 21.43.6 to the subsets
and everything is clear. \square
Comments (0)