Proof.
We will use Lemma 29.45.6 without further mention. Consider the commutative diagram
\xymatrix{ B \ar[r] & B_{red} \\ A \ar[u] \ar[r] & A_{red} \ar[u] }
For any factorization A \to C \to B of A \to B as in (2), we see that A_{red} \to C_{red} \to B_{red} is a factorization of A_{red} \to B_{red} as in (2). It follows that if the lemma holds for A_{red} \to B_{red} and produces the A_{red}-subalgebra B'_{red} \subset B_{red}, then setting B' \subset B equal to the inverse image of B'_{red} solves the lemma for A \to B. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.
Assume A and B are reduced. In this case A \subset B by Algebra, Lemma 10.30.6. Let A \to C \to B be a factorization as in (2). Then we may apply Proposition 29.46.8 to A \subset C to see that every element of C is contained in an extension A[c_1, \ldots , c_ n] \subset C such that for i = 1, \ldots , n we have
c_ i^2, c_ i^3 \in A[c_1, \ldots , c_{i - 1}], or
there exists a prime number p with pc_ i, c_ i^ p \in A[c_1, \ldots , c_{i - 1}].
Thus property (2) holds if we define B' \subset B to be the subset of elements b \in B which are contained in an extension A[b_1, \ldots , b_ n] \subset B such that (*) holds: for i = 1, \ldots , n we have
b_ i^2, b_ i^3 \in A[b_1, \ldots , b_{i - 1}], or
there exists a prime number p with pb_ i, b_ i^ p \in A[b_1, \ldots , b_{i - 1}].
There are only two things to check: (a) B' is an A-subalgebra, and (b) \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) is a universal homeomorphism. Part (a) follows because given n \geq 0 and b_1, \ldots , b_ n \in B satisfying (*) and m \geq 0 and b'_1, \ldots , b'_ m \in B satisfying (*), the integer n + m and b_1, \ldots , b_ n, b'_1, \ldots , b'_ m \in B also satisfies (*). Finally, part (b) holds by Proposition 29.46.8 and our construction of B'.
\square
Comments (0)