Lemma 29.55.2. Let $A \to B$ be a ring map inducing a dominant morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ of spectra. Formation of the $A$-subalgebra $B' \subset B$ in Lemma 29.55.1 commutes with localization (see proof for explanation).
Proof. Let $S \subset A$ be a multiplicative subset. Then $S^{-1}A \to S^{-1}B$ is a ring map which induces a dominant morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S^{-1}B) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S^{-1}A)$ as well (see Lemmas 29.8.4 and 29.25.9). Hence Lemma 29.55.1 produces an $S^{-1}A$-subalgebra $(S^{-1}B)' \subset S^{-1}B$. The statement means that $S^{-1}B' = (S^{-1}B)'$ as $S^{-1}A$-subalgebras of $S^{-1}B$.
To see this is true, we will use the construction of $B'$ and $(S^{-1}B)'$ in the proof of Lemma 29.55.1. In the first step, we see that $B'$ is the inverse image of the $A_{red}$-subalgebra $B'_{red} \subset B_{red}$ constructed for the ring map $A_{red} \to B_{red}$ and similarly for $(S^{-1}B)'$. Noting that $S^{-1}B_{red} = (S^{-1}B)_{red}$ this reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.
If $A$ and $B$ are reduced, we have constructed $B'$ as the union of the subalgebras $A[b_1, \ldots , b_ n]$ such that for $i = 1, \ldots , n$ we have
$b_ i^2, b_ i^3 \in A[b_1, \ldots , b_{i - 1}]$, or
there exists a prime number $p$ with $pb_ i, b_ i^ p \in A[b_1, \ldots , b_{i - 1}]$.
Similarly for $(S^{-1}B)' \subset S^{-1}B$. Thus it is clear that the image of $B' \to B \to S^{-1}B$ is contained in $(S^{-1}B)'$. To show that the corresponding map $S^{-1}B' \to (S^{-1}B)'$ is surjective, one uses Lemma 29.46.3 to clear denominators successively; we omit the details. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$
). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)