First proof.
Let W be the n-truncated simplicial set with W_ i = U_ i for i < n and W_ n = U_ n / \sim where \sim is the equivalence relation generated by f^0(y) \sim f^1(y) for y \in V_ n. This makes sense as the morphisms U(\varphi ) : U_ n \to U_ i corresponding to \varphi : [i] \to [n] for i < n factor through the quotient map U_ n \to W_ n because f^0 and f^1 are morphisms of simplicial sets and equal in degrees < n. Next, we upgrade W to a simplicial set by taking \text{cosk}_ n W. By Lemma 14.32.1 the morphism g : U \to W is a trivial Kan fibration. Observe that g \circ f^0 = g \circ f^1 by construction and denote this morphism f : V \to W. Consider the diagram
\xymatrix{ \partial \Delta [1] \times V \ar[rr]_{f^0, f^1} \ar[d] & & U \ar[d] \\ \Delta [1] \times V \ar[rr]^ f \ar@{-->}[rru] & & W }
By Lemma 14.30.2 the dotted arrow exists and the proof is done.
\square
Second proof.
We have to construct a morphism of simplicial sets h : V \times \Delta [1] \to U which recovers f^ i on composing with e_ i. The case n = 0 was dealt with above the lemma. Thus we may assume that n \geq 1. The map \Delta [1] \to \text{cosk}_1 \text{sk}_1 \Delta [1] is an isomorphism, see Lemma 14.19.15. Thus we see that \Delta [1] \to \text{cosk}_ n \text{sk}_ n \Delta [1] is an isomorphism as n \geq 1, see Lemma 14.19.10. And hence V \times \Delta [1] \to \text{cosk}_ n \text{sk}_ n (V \times \Delta [1]) is an isomorphism too, see Lemma 14.19.12. In other words, in order to construct the homotopy it suffices to construct a suitable morphism of n-truncated simplicial sets h : \text{sk}_ n V \times \text{sk}_ n \Delta [1] \to \text{sk}_ n U.
For k = 0, \ldots , n - 1 we define h_ k by the formula h_ k(v, \alpha ) = f^0(v) = f^1(v). The map h_ n : V_ n \times \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits _{\Delta }([k], [1]) \to U_ n is defined as follows. Pick v \in V_ n and \alpha : [n] \to [1]:
If \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha ) = \{ 0\} , then we set h_ n(v, \alpha ) = f^0(v).
If \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha ) = \{ 0, 1\} , then we set h_ n(v, \alpha ) = f^0(v).
If \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha ) = \{ 1\} , then we set h_ n(v, \alpha ) = f^1(v).
Let \varphi : [k] \to [l] be a morphism of \Delta _{\leq n}. We will show that the diagram
\xymatrix{ V_{l} \times \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits ([l], [1]) \ar[r] \ar[d] & U_{l} \ar[d] \\ V_{k} \times \mathop{\mathrm{Mor}}\nolimits ([k], [1]) \ar[r] & U_{k} }
commutes. Pick v \in V_{l} and \alpha : [l] \to [1]. The commutativity means that
h_ k(V(\varphi )(v), \alpha \circ \varphi ) = U(\varphi )(h_ l(v, \alpha )).
In almost every case this holds because h_ k(V(\varphi )(v), \alpha \circ \varphi ) = f^0(V(\varphi )(v)) and U(\varphi )(h_ l(v, \alpha )) = U(\varphi )(f^0(v)), combined with the fact that f^0 is a morphism of simplicial sets. The only cases where this does not hold is when either (A) \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha ) = \{ 1\} and l = n or (B) \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha \circ \varphi ) = \{ 1\} and k = n. Observe moreover that necessarily f^0(v) = f^1(v) for any degenerate n-simplex of V. Thus we can narrow the cases above down even further to the cases (A) \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha ) = \{ 1\} , l = n and v nondegenerate, and (B) \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha \circ \varphi ) = \{ 1\} , k = n and V(\varphi )(v) nondegenerate.
In case (A), we see that also \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\alpha \circ \varphi ) = \{ 1\} . Hence we see that not only h_ l(v, \alpha ) = f^1(v) but also h_ k(V(\varphi )(v), \alpha \circ \varphi ) = f^1(V(\varphi )(v)). Thus we see that the relation holds because f^1 is a morphism of simplicial sets.
In case (B) we conclude that l = k = n and \varphi is bijective, since otherwise V(\varphi )(v) is degenerate. Thus \varphi = \text{id}_{[n]}, which is a trivial case.
\square
Comments (0)